2009
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.4442-08.2009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cone Contacts, Mosaics, and Territories of Bipolar Cells in the Mouse Retina

Abstract: We report a quantitative analysis of the different bipolar cell types of the mouse retina. They were identified in wild-type mice by specific antibodies or in transgenic mouse lines by specific expression of green fluorescent protein or Clomeleon. The bipolar cell densities, their cone contacts, their dendritic coverage, and their axonal tiling were measured in retinal whole mounts. The results show that each and all cones are contacted by at least one member of any given type of bipolar cell (not considering … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

36
508
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 387 publications
(546 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(94 reference statements)
36
508
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ganglion, amacrine, and bipolar cells were distinguished based on their characteristic morphologies (Wässle et al, 2009). Cells were identified as ON, OFF, or ON-OFF based on the stratification patterns of their dendritic or axonal processes in the inner plexiform layer (IPL).…”
Section: ϫ2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ganglion, amacrine, and bipolar cells were distinguished based on their characteristic morphologies (Wässle et al, 2009). Cells were identified as ON, OFF, or ON-OFF based on the stratification patterns of their dendritic or axonal processes in the inner plexiform layer (IPL).…”
Section: ϫ2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in wt retina, bipolar cells could be classified as ON or OFF based on the level of their axonal stratification in the IPL (see Materials and Methods) (Wässle et al, 2009). Rod ON bipolar cells could be easily distinguished by their bulbous axon terminals in the most proximal layers of the IPL.…”
Section: Spontaneous Inhibitory Activity Primarily Relies On Synapticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To statistically simulate the chromatic tuning (C BG ) of bipolar cell populations (see Fig. 7), we "connected" single bipolar cells with a subset of cones [n cones ϭ n M ϩ n S , taken from the study by Wässle et al (2009)], consisting of S-(n S ) and M-cones (n M ), using the S-cone density as S-cone contact probability (p S ). For each M-cone, the opsin coexpression ratio, R SM , was drawn from a Gaussian, with center (x SM ) and SD ( SM ) estimated from mRNA data (Applebury et al, 2000).…”
Section: ϫ2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, because of this low S-cone density and because mouse BCs have small dendritic fields, only a fraction of nonselective bipolar cells (meaning no preference toward one cone type) has a true S-cone within its reach. For example, for type 1 BCs with approximately eight cone contacts and type 2 BCs with approximately five cone contacts (Wässle et al, 2009), only ϳ30 and ϳ20%, respectively, are expected to receive true S-cone input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further insights can be gained by comparing the processing of rod signals to that of cone signals. Cone signals immediately diverge to approximately 10 bipolar cell types [54][55][56][57][58]. This divergence establishes the parallel processing of visual information, a strategy that is carried forth throughout the brain.…”
Section: How Do Retinal Circuits Relay Single-photon Responses To Retmentioning
confidence: 97%