2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confabulation: Damage to a specific inferior medial prefrontal system

Abstract: Confabulation, the pathological production of false memories, occurs following a variety of aetiologies involving the frontal lobes, and is frequently held to be underpinned by combined memory and executive deficits. However, the critical frontal regions and specific cognitive deficits involved are unclear. Studies in amnesic patients have associated confabulation with damage to the orbital and ventromedial prefrontal cortex.However neuroimaging studies have associated memory control processes which are assume… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
65
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Like PD patients, patients with frontal lesions are not amnesic; however, they do exhibit deficits on tests of free recall Turner, Cipolotti, Yousry, & Shallice, 2007;Wheeler, Stuss, & Tulving, 1995) and source recall, particularly when the tests depend heavily on the use of memory strategies as applies when multiple learning trials are used (Duarte, Ranganath, & Knight, 2005;Janowsky, Shimamura, & Squire, 1989a;Janowsky, Shimamura, Kritchevsky, & Squire, 1989b). On the other hand, when the demands on effortful executive control processes are reduced by the provision of category cues at test and/or strategic instruction, recall performance has been shown to be less affected ; and item recognition memory is relatively normal (Janowsky et al, 1989a;Parkin, Bindschaedler, Harsent, & Metzler, 1996;Schacter, Curran, Galluccio, Milberg, & Bates, 1996;Shimamura, Jurica, Mangels, & Gershberg, 1995).…”
Section: Q3mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Like PD patients, patients with frontal lesions are not amnesic; however, they do exhibit deficits on tests of free recall Turner, Cipolotti, Yousry, & Shallice, 2007;Wheeler, Stuss, & Tulving, 1995) and source recall, particularly when the tests depend heavily on the use of memory strategies as applies when multiple learning trials are used (Duarte, Ranganath, & Knight, 2005;Janowsky, Shimamura, & Squire, 1989a;Janowsky, Shimamura, Kritchevsky, & Squire, 1989b). On the other hand, when the demands on effortful executive control processes are reduced by the provision of category cues at test and/or strategic instruction, recall performance has been shown to be less affected ; and item recognition memory is relatively normal (Janowsky et al, 1989a;Parkin, Bindschaedler, Harsent, & Metzler, 1996;Schacter, Curran, Galluccio, Milberg, & Bates, 1996;Shimamura, Jurica, Mangels, & Gershberg, 1995).…”
Section: Q3mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, more recent neuroimaging and evoked potential investigations have particularly pinpointed damage within the ventro-medial and/or orbito-frontal brain regions (Schnider, 2003;Gilboa et al, 2006;Toosy et al, 2008;Turner, Cipolotti, Yousry, & Shallice, 2008;Gilboa & Verfaellie, 2010;Nahum, Bouzerda-Wahlen, Guggisberg, Ptak, & Schnider, 2012;Hebscher, Barkan-Abramski, Goldsmith, Aharon-Peretz, & Gilboa, 2015;Schnider et al, 2013;Manuel, David, Bikson, & Schnider, 2014).…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue is particularly salient when confabulation is suspected or confirmed to be present [39]. People, including legal professionals and jurors, are more likely to believe a memory is true if the person appears confident in that memory.…”
Section: Memory Confidencementioning
confidence: 99%