2018
DOI: 10.4067/s0034-98872018000200190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confiabilidad de un monitor automatizado para la medición de la presión arterial

Abstract: Reliability of an automatic monitor for blood pressure measurement for DBP. The RC for SBP (6.2, 5.2 and 5.8 mmHg) and DBP (4.7, 4.2 y 5.2 mmHg) was similar between the observers and the device. The ICC for SBP was 0.990 (95% CI 0.983 to 0.995, p < 0.01) and 0.986 (95% CI 0.977 to 0.991, p < 0.01) (Rev Med Chile 2018; 146: 190-195)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recording of BP, was done using digital BP monitor as a normal sphygmomanometer recording would not only disturb the subject during the intervention but also delay the recordings and eliminate the effect the intervention. A standardized digital BP monitor was used (Omron HEM-7130L, Europe), the reliability of which has been established (43). Electrocardiogram (ECG) was recorded in Lead II (sample rate of Hz) for ten minutes, as it is twice the minimum window required for HRV analysis.…”
Section: Baseline (Pre) and Post Intervention Readingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recording of BP, was done using digital BP monitor as a normal sphygmomanometer recording would not only disturb the subject during the intervention but also delay the recordings and eliminate the effect the intervention. A standardized digital BP monitor was used (Omron HEM-7130L, Europe), the reliability of which has been established (43). Electrocardiogram (ECG) was recorded in Lead II (sample rate of Hz) for ten minutes, as it is twice the minimum window required for HRV analysis.…”
Section: Baseline (Pre) and Post Intervention Readingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El Consenso Paraguayo de HTA del 2015 y el Consenso de HTA de Argentina del 2018 siguen a la recomendación propuesta por la Sociedad Europea de Cardiología (ESC) y la Sociedad Europea de Hipertensión (ESH) que definen a la HTA toda PAS ≥140 mmHg y/o PAD ≥90 mmHg. La Sociedad Latinoamericana de Hipertensión Arterial (LASH), en el consenso realizado en el 2017, mantiene la (3,(7)(8)(9)(10) definición de HTA desde cifras de PAS ≥140 mmHg y/o PAD ≥90 mmHg .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified