Confidence Limits on Phylogenies: An Approach Using the Bootstrap

Abstract

The recently‐developed statistical method known as the “bootstrap” can be used to place confidence intervals on phylogenies. It involves resampling points from one's own data, with replacement, to create a series of bootstrap samples of the same size as the original data. Each of these is analyzed, and the variation among the resulting estimates taken to indicate the size of the error involved in making estimates from the original data. In the case of phylogenies, it is argued that the proper method of resampling is to keep all of the original species while sampling characters with replacement, under the assumption that the characters have been independently drawn by the systematist and have evolved independently. Majority‐rule consensus trees can be used to construct a phylogeny showing all of the inferred monophyletic groups that occurred in a majority of the bootstrap samples. If a group shows up 95% of the time or more, the evidence for it is taken to be statistically significant. Existing computer programs can be used to analyze different bootstrap samples by using weights on the characters, the weight of a character being how many times it was drawn in bootstrap sampling. When all characters are perfectly compatible, as envisioned by Hennig, bootstrap sampling becomes unnecessary; the bootstrap method would show significant evidence for a group if it is defined by three or more characters.

Historical population dynamics and demography of the eastern Atlantic pomacentrid Chromis limbata (Valenciennes, 1833)

“…Since, we were assessing an intraspeciWc phylogeny, we adopted a model of evolution with as few assumptions as possible and selected Kimura-2-distance (Kimura, 1980). Topological conWdence was evaluated for both methods with 1000 bootstrap replicates (Felsenstein, 1985). Additionally, a network of haplotypes was constructed using the statistical parsimony method (Templeton et al, 1992) implemented in TCS (Version 1.21, Clement et al, 2000).…”

Claw morphometrics in monitor lizards: Variable substrate and habitat use correlate to shape diversity within a predator guild

“…A 10,000 permutations test against the null hypothesis indicated that phylogenetic signal did influence claw shape ( p  =   0.0034), so this relationship was investigated further. MorphoJ generated phylogenetically independent contrasts (PICs) as a way of measuring relative shape change decoupled from relatedness (Felsenstein, 1985; Klingenberg & Marugán‐Lobón, 2013). The output was in x‐y coordinates for each branching on the phylogeny.…”

Estimating Maximum Likelihood Phylogenies with PhyML

“…Statistical supports for branches displayed by each of the two competing topologies were measured using 100 non-parametric bootstrap replicates (BP; (43)) and the approximate likelihood ratio test for branches (aLRT; (8)). BP and aLRT values (more precisely, pvalues obtained from SH tests) are reported on Fig.…”