2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2021.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confidence set-membership state estimation for LPV systems with inexact scheduling variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last decades, state estimation for LPV systems has been widely studied and applied to feedback control 1,2 and diagnosis. 3,4 However, when the LPV system operates in a wide operating range and with parameter variations, a single LPV estimator often leads to conservative performance. Since the switched systems are able to describe a wide range of complex and nonlinear behaviours, a reasonable approach to avoid this kind of problem is to use Switched Linear Parameter Varying (SLPV) systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the last decades, state estimation for LPV systems has been widely studied and applied to feedback control 1,2 and diagnosis. 3,4 However, when the LPV system operates in a wide operating range and with parameter variations, a single LPV estimator often leads to conservative performance. Since the switched systems are able to describe a wide range of complex and nonlinear behaviours, a reasonable approach to avoid this kind of problem is to use Switched Linear Parameter Varying (SLPV) systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decades, state estimation for LPV systems has been widely studied and applied to feedback control 1,2 and diagnosis 3,4 . However, when the LPV system operates in a wide operating range and with parameter variations, a single LPV estimator often leads to conservative performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 9,10 , the stochastic and set-based approaches are combined to improve the accuracy of the algorithms. Likewise, 11,12 merge stochastic and set-bounded uncertainties to design unified algorithms. Unlike the aforementioned approaches, there exist works as 13,14 that address robustness to stochastic filtering without assuming set-bounded noises.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the robustness of each method relies on the preset confidence level. Finally, the third field consists of merging different representations for uncertainties into a same estimator 3,12,22,23,24,25 . Since both stochastic and setbounded uncertainties are present in the third case, the state-estimation problem becomes even more challenging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the approximation errors are modeled as random variables with specific distributions, which can reduce the conservativeness of the filter. To deal with two types of uncertainties, the merging SM and stochastic method 37,38 is improved to satisfy the finite-dimensional linearized system with arbitrarily distributed approximation errors. By using sample particles to describe the probability distributions of approximation errors, a kind of confidence state set whose level approaches 1 is constructed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%