2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2018.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confidence tracks sensory- and decision-related ERP dynamics during auditory detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
14
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
5
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Confidence should increase with increasing evidence for the perceptual decision. It is therefore unsurprising that the neural correlates of confidence magnitude have found similar EEG markers as those related to the accumulation of the underlying perceptual decision evidence: the P300 ( Gherman and Philiastides, 2015 ; Desender et al, 2016 ; Desender et al, 2019 ; Zakrzewski et al, 2019 ; Rausch et al, 2020 ) and Central Parietal Positivity (CPP; Boldt et al, 2019 ; Herding et al, 2019 , indeed we show a similar effect in Appendix 4). The analysis presented in this manuscript targeted confidence precision rather than confidence magnitude, by assessing confidence relative to an optimal observer who gives high confidence ratings on trials where the evidence in favour of the perceptual choice is greater than the median across trials.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Confidence should increase with increasing evidence for the perceptual decision. It is therefore unsurprising that the neural correlates of confidence magnitude have found similar EEG markers as those related to the accumulation of the underlying perceptual decision evidence: the P300 ( Gherman and Philiastides, 2015 ; Desender et al, 2016 ; Desender et al, 2019 ; Zakrzewski et al, 2019 ; Rausch et al, 2020 ) and Central Parietal Positivity (CPP; Boldt et al, 2019 ; Herding et al, 2019 , indeed we show a similar effect in Appendix 4). The analysis presented in this manuscript targeted confidence precision rather than confidence magnitude, by assessing confidence relative to an optimal observer who gives high confidence ratings on trials where the evidence in favour of the perceptual choice is greater than the median across trials.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Confidence should increase with increasing evidence for the perceptual decision. It is therefore unsurprising that the neural correlates of confidence magnitude have found similar EEG markers as those related to the accumulation of the underlying perceptual decision evidence: the P300 (Gherman and Philiastides, 2015;Desender et al, 2016;Desender et al, 2019;Zakrzewski et al, 2019;Rausch et al, 2020); and Central Parietal Positivity (CPP; Boldt et al, 2019;Herding et al, 2019, indeed we show a similar effect in Supplementary Note 4). The analysis presented in this manuscript targeted confidence precision rather than confidence magnitude, by assessing confidence relative to an optimal observer who gives high confidence ratings on trials where the evidence in favour of the perceptual choice is greater than the median across trials.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Confidence in perceptual judgements (Fleming and Lau 2014), positively correlates with decision accuracy (Morgan, Mason, and Solomon 1997;Kunimoto, Miller, and Pashler 2001;Gherman and Philiastides 2018), and reliably tracks ERP dynamics related to error (Boldt and Yeung 2015) and sensory processing (e.g. Zakrzewski et al 2019). Confidence in mind wandering reports has to date been neglected but preliminary work has shown that it varies greatly within and between individuals and moderates the relationship between response time variability and self-reports of mind wandering (Seli et al 2015) (but see Meier 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%