2016 International Conference on Industrial Informatics and Computer Systems (CIICS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/iccsii.2016.7462435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Configurable ZigBee-based control system for people with multiple disabilities in smart homes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While WLAN/WPAN provide a short range connectivity (about 1-100 metres) to support device-to-device (D2D) communication with a high data rate, LPWAN does not require much power, nor bandwidth to operate and provides long range connectivity (up to 50 kilometres) [35]. Some typical communication technologies of WLAN/WPAN including Radio-frequency Identification (RFID) [36], Bluetooth Low Energy 4.0 [37], Zigbee [38], and Wi-Fi (IEEE 802.11) are applied in different IoT applications such as Smart Tourism [39], Smart Home [40], Connected Health [41]. LPWAN technologies including unlicensed (e.g.…”
Section: ) Communication Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While WLAN/WPAN provide a short range connectivity (about 1-100 metres) to support device-to-device (D2D) communication with a high data rate, LPWAN does not require much power, nor bandwidth to operate and provides long range connectivity (up to 50 kilometres) [35]. Some typical communication technologies of WLAN/WPAN including Radio-frequency Identification (RFID) [36], Bluetooth Low Energy 4.0 [37], Zigbee [38], and Wi-Fi (IEEE 802.11) are applied in different IoT applications such as Smart Tourism [39], Smart Home [40], Connected Health [41]. LPWAN technologies including unlicensed (e.g.…”
Section: ) Communication Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous proposals have addressed the monitoring of people with disabilities [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]; however, these share three main drawbacks. First, to the best of our knowledge, none have attempted to address the customization needed for each IoT HMS scenario.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated by the authors of [ 4 ], it is difficult to make a clear distinction between these groups of disabilities because individuals with one disability often suffer from other limitations or chronic health problems. Thus, research has been undertaken to attempt to address different types of disabilities; for example, [ 5 ] proposed a framework to manage a collection of devices and applications in a home environment for people with different disabilities (blind, nonspeaking, etc.). However, this approach did not have the benefits of today’s IoT systems, which allow continuous connectivity of all devices, and thus allow uninterrupted telemetries and can enable a response in real time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, enhancement of system on chip (SoC) and cloud computing have stimulated concerning over practical low-power networks, requiring for both security and low-power consumption, for instance, Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), Zigbee, etc. [2]. Nowadays, NCSs are becoming more and more popular in both industry and daily life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%