2002
DOI: 10.1068/p3339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Configural Face Processing Develops more Slowly than Featural Face Processing

Abstract: Expertise in face processing takes many years to develop. To determine the contribution of different face-processing skills to this slow development, we altered a single face so as to create sets of faces designed to measure featural, configural, and contour processing. Within each set, faces differed only in the shape of the eyes and mouth (featural set), only in the spacing of the eyes and mouth (spacing set), or only in the shape of the external contour (contour set). We presented adults, and children aged … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

46
589
7
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 567 publications
(645 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
46
589
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the effect is sensitive to configural information, but it does not tell us which one. The lack of correlation with the composite effect in our study would suggest that holistic processing was not involved and would make the second-order relations a good candidate But inverting the face can also disturb the processing of componential information (e.g., Baudouin& Humphreys, 2006;Mondloch et al, 2002), adding complexity to any conclusion. Further studies are needed to explore the various possibilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Thus, the effect is sensitive to configural information, but it does not tell us which one. The lack of correlation with the composite effect in our study would suggest that holistic processing was not involved and would make the second-order relations a good candidate But inverting the face can also disturb the processing of componential information (e.g., Baudouin& Humphreys, 2006;Mondloch et al, 2002), adding complexity to any conclusion. Further studies are needed to explore the various possibilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The late maturation hypothesis posits that children do not remember faces as accurately as adults because face processing ability does not fully develop until at least adolescence (see Carey & Diamond, 1977;Mondloch, Le Grand, & Maurer, 2002). Evidence from the basic face processing literature suggests that children's sensitivity may be poorer because they tend to engage in more feature-based rather than configural-based processing (Mondloch, Geldart, Maurer, & Le Grand, 2003: Mondloch, et al, 2002Schwarzer, 2000). The recognition of faces using configural information may not reach adult levels until adolescence (Bruce et al, 2000;Carey, Diamond, & Woods, 1980;Mondloch, et al, 2003: Mondloch, et al, 2002.…”
Section: Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis Of Age-related Chmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed there has been research suggesting that newborns preferentially orient towards face-like stimuli (e.g., Johnson, Dziurawiec, Ellis, & Morton, 1991), recognising certain properties of faces from birth and distinguishing internal features by about the middle of the first year (see De Haan, 2001, for review). However, the configural processing that characterises adult-like face processing is not observed until late-childhood (Carey & Diamond, 1994;Chung & Thomson, 1995;Mondloch et al, 2002). Relatively few studies have examined the developmental trajectory of holistic processing in typically developing children.…”
Section: The Development Of Holistic Processing In Typical Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trial order was randomised within orientation blocks (part-whole) but the block order was fixed (orientation). In fixing the block order, we followed previous studies that have begun with upright face trials to maximise the ecological validity of the face recognition task, and blocked orientation to allow children to develop recognition strategies for each orientation (e.g., LeGrand et al, 2003;Mondloch et al, 2002;Yovel & Kanwisher, in press). A fixed order of blocks risks confounding orientation effects with order effects in the results, for example, if there is poorer performance on later blocks through tiredness.…”
Section: Try To Answer As Fast As Possible"mentioning
confidence: 99%