2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2016.11.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Configuration of the Moho discontinuity beneath the Japanese Islands derived from three-dimensional seismic tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the hypocenters are separated into a shallow spot at a depth of 10-15 km and a deep spot at a depth of 20-27 km, while the hypocenters of DLF earthquakes in most of the other volcanoes have continuous distributions in the vertical direction according to the JMA catalog. Both spots are above the Moho discontinuity in the Kirishima volcanoes at the depth of approximately 30 km here (Matsubara et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In other words, the hypocenters are separated into a shallow spot at a depth of 10-15 km and a deep spot at a depth of 20-27 km, while the hypocenters of DLF earthquakes in most of the other volcanoes have continuous distributions in the vertical direction according to the JMA catalog. Both spots are above the Moho discontinuity in the Kirishima volcanoes at the depth of approximately 30 km here (Matsubara et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…A large white circle is a hypocenter of the main shock determined by the present study. The Moho byMatsubara et al (2017b) is shown by yellow circles. White circles show the top of the Pacific Plate by…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that the brittle part may have extended to that depth in the source region. Note that the Moho depth in the source region has been estimated to be 32-34 km (Katsumata 2010, Matsubara et al 2017. The centroid depth of the Global CMT solution is 31 km, which is approximately 9 km deeper than the depth of the large slip in our model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%