1988
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(1988)114:10(1257)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confinement and Bed‐Friction Effects in Shallow Turbulent Mixing Layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
152
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
8
152
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also known from shallow mixing layer studies that flow confinement and bed roughness tend to constraint the lateral extent of the mixing layer (a decrease in H or an increase in bed roughness lead to a decrease in δ). Chu and Babarutsi (1988) suggested to normalise the shallow mixing layer width δ in the way δ * = δc f /(Hλ) where c f is the averaged bed friction coefficient across the mixing layer (c f = 0.5(c f 1 + c f 2 ) with c f i = τ b /(0.5ρU 2 i ), i ∈ {1, 2} and τ b the bed shear stress) and showed that for flows that are shallow enough the quantity δ * converges towards a constant value when going downstream (δ * max ≈ 0.13). In the following a similar normalisation of the mixing layer width as done by Chu and Babarutsi (1988) is carried out.…”
Section: Mixing Layer Widthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also known from shallow mixing layer studies that flow confinement and bed roughness tend to constraint the lateral extent of the mixing layer (a decrease in H or an increase in bed roughness lead to a decrease in δ). Chu and Babarutsi (1988) suggested to normalise the shallow mixing layer width δ in the way δ * = δc f /(Hλ) where c f is the averaged bed friction coefficient across the mixing layer (c f = 0.5(c f 1 + c f 2 ) with c f i = τ b /(0.5ρU 2 i ), i ∈ {1, 2} and τ b the bed shear stress) and showed that for flows that are shallow enough the quantity δ * converges towards a constant value when going downstream (δ * max ≈ 0.13). In the following a similar normalisation of the mixing layer width as done by Chu and Babarutsi (1988) is carried out.…”
Section: Mixing Layer Widthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polystyrene was too light; the airflow above the surface had too big an influence on the floating particles. Polyethylene (PE) and Polypropylene (PP) have a density of 0.9 g/cm 3 , which worked very well.…”
Section: Elements Of the Measuring Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shallow flow phenomena can be found in rivers, coastal zones or the atmosphere, where the dominating processes are two-dimensional [1]. Large coherent motions, that are inititated, for instance, in shallow wake flows behind obstacles [2] or in shallow mixing layers [3][4][5] strongly influence the dynamics of such a system and are, therefore, a determining factor for the mixing and transport processes. Measurement of the velocity field describing the generation and the evolution of these coherent motions is the major aim of this investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the scales of the 3D bottom turbulence and the quasi 2D turbulence are rather disparate, the energy balance of the turbulence is governed by both. Previous studies on shallow shear flows [5,7,31] have indicated that the dynamics of the quasi 2D turbulence in combination with 3D turbulence is not well understood and difficult to represent in an efficient model. [34].…”
Section: The Shallow Mixing Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The arrows indicate the mean streamwise velocity 1.2 Linear behaviour of unstable flows in a shallow mixing layer A study by [33] has revealed that the spectral distribution of the large scale motions of a shallow mixing layer can be predicted from a linear stability analysis. First, the mean flow was predicted, based on the self-similarity method proposed by [5]. This resulted in the transverse profiles of the mean streamwise velocity.…”
Section: The Shallow Mixing Layermentioning
confidence: 99%