2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.98.035427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confining graphene plasmons to the ultimate limit

Abstract: Graphene plasmons have recently attracted a great deal of attention because of their tunability, long lifetime, and high degree of field confinement in the vertical direction. Nearby metal gates have been shown to modify the graphene plasmon dispersion and further confine their electric field. We study the plasmons of a graphene sheet deposited on a metal, in the regime in which metal bands do not hybridize with massless Dirac fermion bands. We derive exact results for the dispersion and lifetime of the plasmo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the frequency dependence of the plasmon width also changes severely with metal thickness, going from a reduction to an increase with increasing frequency as the gold layer is made thicker, again indicating a complex evolution of metal screening with this geometrical parameter. It is remarkable that acoustic plasmons exist even by directly depositing the graphene on the metal without spacing, which corroborates a recent prediction of this effect [24], and defies the intuition that metal screening can quench the graphene response. At low mid-IR frequencies, the acoustic plasmons are predicted to exhibit smaller lifetimes as the film thickness increases; thicker metal films are thus providing more efficient screening and less relative weight of the field inside the metal, where the intrinsic inelastic rate is larger than in the graphene alone (cf.…”
Section: A Graphene Supported On Metalsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the frequency dependence of the plasmon width also changes severely with metal thickness, going from a reduction to an increase with increasing frequency as the gold layer is made thicker, again indicating a complex evolution of metal screening with this geometrical parameter. It is remarkable that acoustic plasmons exist even by directly depositing the graphene on the metal without spacing, which corroborates a recent prediction of this effect [24], and defies the intuition that metal screening can quench the graphene response. At low mid-IR frequencies, the acoustic plasmons are predicted to exhibit smaller lifetimes as the film thickness increases; thicker metal films are thus providing more efficient screening and less relative weight of the field inside the metal, where the intrinsic inelastic rate is larger than in the graphene alone (cf.…”
Section: A Graphene Supported On Metalsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…1), or also in graphene and a metal surface, emerging as a low-energy branch in the energy-momentum dispersion diagram [23]. In contrast to the intuition that metal screening quenches the graphene response, an acoustic plasmon branch has been predicted to manifest itself even when graphene is directly deposited on the metal without a spacer [24]. For atomic-scale graphene-metal separations, the nonlocal nature of the optical response in both the metal and graphene layers plays an important role, demanding a rigorous theoretical treatment to accurately describe the dispersion and lifetime of acoustic plasmons [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This underlies the incorrect conclusion drawn by Harris 85 and calls into question many other works such as Ref. 99 . That Eq.…”
Section: Responses By the Semi-classical Modelmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For AGPs in GDM structures, this shift can be substantial at small graphene-metal separations and is also responsible for the slowdown of the AGPs' velocity 8,10 . Moreover, as the graphene-metal separation t is reduced, the nonlocal description predicts plasmon velocities asymptotically approaching electron velocity vF, but without ever surpassing (falling below) it 8,10,157 . This is in stark contrast to the local-response prediction which allows the AGP's dispersion to fall inside the prohibited graphene's intraband electron-hole continuum.…”
Section: Nonlocalitymentioning
confidence: 95%