Abstract. The subject of the paper is to discuss and quantify deviations from reciprocity of the bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF), i.e., the difference of BRDF obtained when inverting illumination and viewing directions. Directional reciprocity is not valid in general, because when the illumination beam has a spatial extension larger than the viewed area (as is most often the case for BRDF measurements), some of the scatterers building up the observed radiance are located at different places in reciprocal measurements. The physical systems under consideration in the two experiments are different, hence the breakdown of reciprocity. The paper develops a theory aiming at a quantitative estimation of deviations from directional reciprocity due to this factor. The theory is based on integral forms of the radiative transfer equation in a horizontal slab of heterogeneous absorbing and scattering media. The observed scene radiance is expanded in a series of scattering orders. Integral expressions of the single-and multiple-scattering radiance are derived and put in a form suitable for the analysis of the reciprocity problem.
IntroductionThe principle of reciprocity, also referred to as Helmoltz reciprocity, is widely accepted in various branches of physics. Its modern and most general form [Van der Hulst, 1980] states that "in any linear physical system, the channels which lead from a cause at one point to an effect at another point can be equally well traversed in the opposite direction. Let the cause be first placed at P and the effect measured at Q; and in a second experiment, carried out in the same physical system, let the cause be at Q and the effect at P. The reciprocity principle is then expressed by the proportionality: effect at Q/cause at P = effect at P/cause at Q.