1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0034-4257(98)00004-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confirmation of Helmholtz Reciprocity Using ScaRaB Satellite Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The orbit plane precessed relative to the Sun‐Earth vector with a period of approximately 213 days, resulting in full coverage of the diurnal cycle in about 106 days. The ScaRaB instrument is a cross‐track scanning radiometer with a swath of 97.82° (that is, the maximum satellite nadir angle is 48.91°, yielding a maximum viewing zenith angle of 63.57° considering the curvature of the Earth) [ Capderou , 1998]. The angular resolution of instantaneous field of view is 48 × 48 mrad 2 , corresponding to a pixel size of 60 × 60 km 2 at nadir.…”
Section: Scarab Project and Inversion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The orbit plane precessed relative to the Sun‐Earth vector with a period of approximately 213 days, resulting in full coverage of the diurnal cycle in about 106 days. The ScaRaB instrument is a cross‐track scanning radiometer with a swath of 97.82° (that is, the maximum satellite nadir angle is 48.91°, yielding a maximum viewing zenith angle of 63.57° considering the curvature of the Earth) [ Capderou , 1998]. The angular resolution of instantaneous field of view is 48 × 48 mrad 2 , corresponding to a pixel size of 60 × 60 km 2 at nadir.…”
Section: Scarab Project and Inversion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the 10 m scale in land surface remote sensing studies, Kriebel [1996] found some deviation to directional reciprocity using airborne data. At the 50 km scale, clear scenes of Earth radiation budget satellite sensor data showed an insignificant deviation from reciprocity [Davies, 1994;Capderou, 1998], while significant deviations were seen with scenes containing clouds [Davies, 1994;Loeb and Davies, 1997]. Lunar photometry measurements over large areas of the moon gave satisfactory directional reciprocity results at the scale of hundreds of kilometers [Minnaert, 1941].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%