2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-006-0512-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confirmation of quantitative trait loci for ethanol sensitivity and neurotensin receptor density in crosses derived from the inbred High and Low Alcohol Sensitive selectively bred rat lines

Abstract: QTL mapping in crosses derived from the IHAS1 and ILAS1 has successfully identified loci related to alcohol sensitivity. Recombinant congenics are now being bred to more finely map the confirmed QTLs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
4
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Genes in the highest nodes are connected to the largest number of gene sets and are thus considered more highly supported candidates by empirical evidence. The six QTLs that overlap with the Chr 3 hypothermia QTL are Alcp3 (Peirce et al 1998), Ap6q (Tarantino et al 1998), Letohc1 (Belknap and Atkins 2001), Lore10 (Bennett et al 2006) from mouse and Alcrsp17 (Radcliffe et al 2006) and Alcrsp28 (Radcliffe et al 2009) from rat. The gene expression sets that intersect with positional candidates from the QTL interval are ‘GS128167: Lewis vs. Fischer GABA’ (Sharp et al 2011) with differential expression in the nucleus accumbens (NA) shell GABA neurons projecting to ventral pallidum in these two strains, ‘GS31783: Gx Corr Neo Cortex’ (Phillips et al 1994) where the gene expression in BXD Neocortex ILM6v1.1 (Feb08) RankInv microarray data from GeneNetwork.org was correlated with preference for 10% ethanol (g/kg) in a two-bottle choice, ‘GS3647: Et Pref Meta Analysis’ (Mulligan et al 2006) consisting of genes from the meta-analysis of differential expression in six isogenic and three selected lines with elevated voluntary ethanol consumption, ‘GS87303: Alcohol preferring vs. non-preferring Rats’ (Edenberg et al 2005) consisting of differential expression in the hippocampus of inbred alcohol-preferring (iP) and -nonpreferring (iNP) rats, and ‘GS128167: DiffExprs EtOH NA’ (Rodd et al 2008) consisting of differential expression in the NA of inbred alcohol-preferring mice…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genes in the highest nodes are connected to the largest number of gene sets and are thus considered more highly supported candidates by empirical evidence. The six QTLs that overlap with the Chr 3 hypothermia QTL are Alcp3 (Peirce et al 1998), Ap6q (Tarantino et al 1998), Letohc1 (Belknap and Atkins 2001), Lore10 (Bennett et al 2006) from mouse and Alcrsp17 (Radcliffe et al 2006) and Alcrsp28 (Radcliffe et al 2009) from rat. The gene expression sets that intersect with positional candidates from the QTL interval are ‘GS128167: Lewis vs. Fischer GABA’ (Sharp et al 2011) with differential expression in the nucleus accumbens (NA) shell GABA neurons projecting to ventral pallidum in these two strains, ‘GS31783: Gx Corr Neo Cortex’ (Phillips et al 1994) where the gene expression in BXD Neocortex ILM6v1.1 (Feb08) RankInv microarray data from GeneNetwork.org was correlated with preference for 10% ethanol (g/kg) in a two-bottle choice, ‘GS3647: Et Pref Meta Analysis’ (Mulligan et al 2006) consisting of genes from the meta-analysis of differential expression in six isogenic and three selected lines with elevated voluntary ethanol consumption, ‘GS87303: Alcohol preferring vs. non-preferring Rats’ (Edenberg et al 2005) consisting of differential expression in the hippocampus of inbred alcohol-preferring (iP) and -nonpreferring (iNP) rats, and ‘GS128167: DiffExprs EtOH NA’ (Rodd et al 2008) consisting of differential expression in the NA of inbred alcohol-preferring mice…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1975; O’Connor et al . 1999; Ponomarev & Crabbe 2004; Radcliffe et al . 2006; Radlow & Hurst 1985; Ramchandani et al .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…The “Addict” F1 and F2 offspring displayed increased cocaine self‐administration, while no effect on cocaine self‐administration was detected in the “Non‐addict” F1 and F2 offspring (Le et al ., ). Previous studies that have separated mouse drug‐response into high and low responders have identified numerous genetic differences between these sub‐populations (Radcliffe et al ., ; He et al ., ; Belknap et al ., ). These findings provided support for a gene by environment interaction that can greatly alter the effects of paternal cocaine exposure.…”
Section: Cocainementioning
confidence: 99%