2015
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/808/2/169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confirmation of the Planetary Microlensing Signal and Star and Planet Mass Determinations for Event Ogle-2005-BLG-169

Abstract: We present Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) observations of the source and lens stars for planetary microlensing event OGLE-2005-BLG-169, which confirm the relative proper motion prediction due to the planetary light curve signal observed for this event. This (and the companion Keck result) provide the first confirmation of a planetary microlensing signal, for which the deviation was only 2%. The follow-up observations determine the flux of the planetary host star in multiple passbands a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
194
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
5
194
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Close-ups of summed images centered on the OGLE-2007-BLG-349 target from each visit are shown in Figure 8, and the change in magnification of the target is clearly visible. Because these images were taken within a year of peak magnification, the separation between the lens and source stars (Bennett et al 2006(Bennett et al , 2007(Bennett et al , 2015 is not detectable.…”
Section: Hst Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Close-ups of summed images centered on the OGLE-2007-BLG-349 target from each visit are shown in Figure 8, and the change in magnification of the target is clearly visible. Because these images were taken within a year of peak magnification, the separation between the lens and source stars (Bennett et al 2006(Bennett et al , 2007(Bennett et al , 2015 is not detectable.…”
Section: Hst Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For possibilities 1 and 3, we require a mass-luminosity relation, and we use the same empirical mass-luminosity relation that was used in Bennett et al (2015). We use the mass-luminosity relations of Henry & McCarthy (1993), Henry et al (1999), and Delfosse et al (2000) …”
Section: Light-curve Models With Hst Constraintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2017). The lens detection can be confirmed by measuring the lens-source relative proper motion (Batista et al 2015;Bennett et al 2015). Figure 7 shows the probability distribution of I-, V-, H-, and K-band magnitudeof the lens star with extinction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…For each MCMC fit, the source distance is picked randomly from this distribution. From emperical mass-luminosity relations (Henry & McCarthy 1993;Henry et al 1999;Delfosse et al 2000) and massdistance relations, we estimated the lens distance, host-star and planet mass, host-star brightness, and host-star and planet projected separation using a method similar to that used by Batista et al (2015) and Bennett et al (2015). Then, we calculated mean, median, and posterior distributions for each parameter from all of these MCMC fits, as seen in Table 3 , spans the range from the mass of Saturn to that of Jupiter.…”
Section: Lens Properties and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is close to the Jupiter/Sun mass ratio, but the host star probably has a mass of *   M M , so this planet is probably a low-mass gas giant, like Saturn. Follow-up observations with JWST, HST, or adaptive optics in 2020-2022 should be able to measure the lens brightness and determine the planetary mass and distance using the methods of Bennett et al (2006Bennett et al ( , 2007Bennett et al ( , 2015, and Batista et al (2015). Later with WFIRST (Spergel et al 2015), a similar kind of study will provide the statistics needed to determine the planetary mass function as a function of the host-star mass and distance.…”
Section: Lens Properties and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%