2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12520-018-0742-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confirmation of the role of geographic isolation by distance in among-tribe variations in beadwork designs and manufacture on the High Plains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An exception was the most geographically restricted clan, the Plus-One clan, which spanned ∼1,000 km (the approximate annual home range of eastern tropical Pacific sperm whales) ( 29 , 30 ). Isolation by distance has been documented in culturally transmitted attributes of other species, such as human material culture (e.g., the beadwork patterns of High Plains ethnolinguistic tribes) ( 31 ) and red-faced cisticola ( Cisticola erythrops ) song ( 32 ). The observed decrease in coda usage similarity over space was steeper for nonidentity codas compared with identity codas, but this trend was not significant across all clans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exception was the most geographically restricted clan, the Plus-One clan, which spanned ∼1,000 km (the approximate annual home range of eastern tropical Pacific sperm whales) ( 29 , 30 ). Isolation by distance has been documented in culturally transmitted attributes of other species, such as human material culture (e.g., the beadwork patterns of High Plains ethnolinguistic tribes) ( 31 ) and red-faced cisticola ( Cisticola erythrops ) song ( 32 ). The observed decrease in coda usage similarity over space was steeper for nonidentity codas compared with identity codas, but this trend was not significant across all clans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the everyday practice of informal assessments of similarity, some studies have turned to quantitative methods to explore the relationship between geographic distance and similarity (i.e., density of particular artefact types, presence/absence of particular traits, etc.) for detecting structure of archaeological cultures (Renfrew, 1977;Kimes et al, 1982;Shennan et al, 2015;Lycett, 2019). Here, the premise is that groups in closer proximity to each other tend to interact and share knowledge more frequently than those farther apart (Johnson et al, 2006;Ross and Atkinson, 2016;Derungs et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%