2018
DOI: 10.1002/erv.2631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confirmatory factor analysis and psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Repetitive Eating Questionnaire: Further evidence for two distinct subtypes of grazing behaviour

Abstract: This study confirmed the proposed factor structure of the Rep(eat)-Q in a community sample, offering additional support to the conceptual distinction between compulsive (marked by loss of control) and repetitive (noncompulsive) subtypes of grazing behaviour.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher scores indicate a higher frequency of repetitive eating. Norwegian translation has shown excellent psychometric properties and a two-factor model which confirmed the original solution (Reas, Lindvall Dahlgren, Wonderlich, Syversen, & Lundin Kvalem, 2019). The Cronbach's a for the total scale score at baseline and 1 year were 0.93 and 0.91, respectively.…”
Section: Grazingmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Higher scores indicate a higher frequency of repetitive eating. Norwegian translation has shown excellent psychometric properties and a two-factor model which confirmed the original solution (Reas, Lindvall Dahlgren, Wonderlich, Syversen, & Lundin Kvalem, 2019). The Cronbach's a for the total scale score at baseline and 1 year were 0.93 and 0.91, respectively.…”
Section: Grazingmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Grazing was at baseline assessed with the Repetitive Eating Questionnaire (REP-Q) ( 109 ) using the Norwegian version of the Repetitive Eating Questionnaire ( 110 ). The measurement is an indicator of presence or absence of compulsive and repetitive eating (eating in a distracted or mindless way).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the BMI was calculated (weight/height²). BMI (kg/m²) was categorized as follows: Underweight (<18,5), normal weight (18,(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)9), overweight (25)(26)(27)(28)(29)9), and obesity (≥30) 28 .…”
Section: Sociodemographic and Anthropometric Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In community settings, grazing has been positively correlated with Body Mass Index (BMI), psychological distress, and ED symptomatology (e.g. cognitive restraint, weight, shape, and eating concerns) 7,8 . However, individuals with LOC grazing exhibited higher levels of ED pathology than those with non-compuls ive grazing 7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation