2018
DOI: 10.1002/eat.22848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confirmatory factor analysis of the Eating Disorder Examination‐Questionnaire: A comparison of five factor solutions across vegan and omnivore participants

Abstract: Our data confirm difficulties in replicating the proposed factor structure of the EDE-Q, including in vegans. More research is needed to determine the suitability of the EDE-Q for quantifying eating behaviors, including in those abstaining from animal products.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It includes items that assess ED behaviors, cognitions, and physiological factors. The EDDI has excellent test–retest reliability (Heiss, Boswell, & Hormes, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It includes items that assess ED behaviors, cognitions, and physiological factors. The EDDI has excellent test–retest reliability (Heiss, Boswell, & Hormes, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these 22 items, a four-factor structure has been proposed representing eating restraint, eating concern, weight concern and shape concern. However, this factor structure could not be replicated in the literature (Heiss, Boswell, & Hormes, 2018;Rand-Giovannetti, Cicero, Mond, & Latner, 2020). Therefore, we only used the total score in the current analyses.…”
Section: Eating Disorder Symptomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EDE‐Q can be used to produce a summary of both attitudinal (e.g., concerns about weight) and behavioral (e.g., binge eating) symptoms and the measure has been used in clinical and non‐clinical populations (e.g., see Carey et al, 2019, for a recent review). Although the EDE‐Q has demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity, the originally proposed factor structure for the attitudinal items has “proven difficult to replicate” (Heiss, Boswell, & Hormes, 2018, p. 419; see also Carey et al, 2019). Furthermore, the 28‐item EDE‐Q may be of limited use in epidemiology research and clinical settings in which response burden is often a concern (Gideon et al, 2016; Kliem et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%