Confirmatory Factor and Smallest Space Analyses on the Belief in a Just World Scale

Harding, Warren G.; Kumar, V. K.; McConatha, Jasmin Tahmaseb

doi:10.1007/s11211-020-00360-x

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While reflexive just-world beliefs are consistently related to subjective well-being, no such connection was found for non-reflexive just-world beliefs (Harding et al, 2021;Lucas et al, 2011. Instead, beliefs that the world is just for others were found to be associated with harsh social attitudes and a preference for exclusive welfare policies (Bègue and Bastounis, 2003;Furnham and Gunter, 1984;Khera et al, 2014;Lipkusa et al, 1996;Sutton and Douglas, 2005).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Subjective Inequity Aversion: How Unfair Inequality Affects Subjective Well-Being

Bohmann¹,

Kalleitner²

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper argues that `inequity aversion' can be understood as an emotional reaction to perceived injustice that arises from individuals’ comparisons of their own and others’ outcomes to a subjective fairness ideal. In particular, we assume that subjective perceptions of inequity and not objective deviations from equality are crucial to understanding how individuals react to inequality. The paper formalizes these insights by adapting the Fehr and Schmidt (1999) model of inequity aversion replacing the fairness frame of objective equality with subjectively perceived equity. We test this model using data from the European Social Survey 2018 analyzing the association between respondents' perceived fairness of own, top, and bottom incomes with subjective well-being and preferences for redistribution. Results from spline regressions with country-fixed effects indicate that perceived injustice of own and top incomes is positively related to individuals' subjective well-being. For the perceived injustice of bottom incomes, we find no substantive relationships with subjective well-being. Further analyses indicate a positive link between the perceived injustice of bottom and top incomes and preferences for redistribution. In sum, our results suggest that injustice perceived for oneself is connected to utility while perceived injustice of others is related to increased willingness to back redistributive policy proposals even if they are not in line with material self-interest.

show abstract