2012
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2011-2504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confirmatory Testing in Primary Aldosteronism

Abstract: Most patients with positive case detection also had positive results on the CCT and FUT, especially when ARR was at least 1000 or PAC was at least 250 pg/ml under renin suppresion. Confirmatory testing for PA may not be needed in all patients with positive case detection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
57
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…20,28 Of these testing, lack of 24-hour urine aldosterone data after oral salt-loading test and FDST as the most reliable confirmatory testings 17 is a significant limitation of the present study in the specificity of the diagnosis of PA and non-PA. We have demonstrated that negative results in both of CCT and SIT were seen only in 1 (1.7%) of the 57 hypertensive patients with positive case detection. 29 Mulatero et al 21 also reported that SIT is a reliable alternative to the FDST for confirming the diagnosis of PA. In addition, we used a PAC cutoff of 50 pg/mL for the SIT, a more permissive value for PA and stricter one for non-PA than used in previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,28 Of these testing, lack of 24-hour urine aldosterone data after oral salt-loading test and FDST as the most reliable confirmatory testings 17 is a significant limitation of the present study in the specificity of the diagnosis of PA and non-PA. We have demonstrated that negative results in both of CCT and SIT were seen only in 1 (1.7%) of the 57 hypertensive patients with positive case detection. 29 Mulatero et al 21 also reported that SIT is a reliable alternative to the FDST for confirming the diagnosis of PA. In addition, we used a PAC cutoff of 50 pg/mL for the SIT, a more permissive value for PA and stricter one for non-PA than used in previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, at our institution, we have long used the same definition of an abnormal ARR along with high-probability features (eg, ARR >2200 pmol L −1 ng −1 mL −1 h −1 and hypokalemia) to identify highly probable PA, even without further conventional confirmatory testing with few (<3%) false-positive results, 14 as is consistent with other reports. 21,22 Second, we also did not systematically use any aldosterone cutoff as part of our screening criteria. As such, it is possible that some of our cases may have had lower than typical aldosterone levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in keeping with previous reports that a marked elevation in the ARR with highprobability features is highly specific for PA with few false-positive results. 14,21,22 Second, a probable diagnosis was defined by an ARR >2200 pmol L −1 ng −1 mL −1 h −1 without consideration of potassium. Finally, a possible diagnosis was defined by an ARR >550 pmol L .…”
Section: Case Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blood samples for PRA or DRC, aldosterone, and potassium are drawn at time zero and after 2 h. PRA < 2 ng/mL/h (or DRC < 24 mU/L) confirms the PA diagnosis (26). Although patients with essential hypertension can present low renin levels, plasma renin activity (PRA) increases above 2 ng/mL/h after furosemide injection.…”
Section: Screening and Case Confirmationmentioning
confidence: 99%