“…In some cases, such relationships between groups scattered throughout an entire region looked to Guiart like "networks of identification" (1963: 631), 31 particularly in the region north of a line roughly between Temala and Tipindje, where local groups were distributed, patchwork fashion, between two mutually hostile, ritually opposed groupings known as Hoot and Waap (Douglas 1992a: 94-96;Guiart 1957: 21-27;1966: 49-53;Guiart and Bensa 1981;Leenhardt 1930: 105). 32 Stress on lateral relationships -an insistent theme in contemporary action descriptions (Douglas 1992a: 93-95) -encouraged political equilibrium throughout the region and might have inhibited the formation of more complex hierarchies, though at the onset of regular European contacts in 1843 the opposed "networks" included some influential chiefdoms (Douglas 1979a;1980;Guiart 1963: 630-632, 639-640, 646). Conquest of territory seems not to have been a feature of Hoot/Waap opposition, which, though often implicated in alliance formation, was of mainly symbolic and ritual significance (Guiart 1985:91).…”