Conflict, Collaboration and Climate Change: Participatory Democracy and Urban Environmental Struggles in Durban, South Africa

Abstract

The South Durban Basin on the eastern coast of South Africa is home to both a large-scale petrochemical industry and a highly mobilized residential community. In a conflict cemented by apartheid-era planning, the community's campaigns to improve local air quality provide a test case for the value of conflict for participatory democratic structures. In the context of the work of the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the South Durban Basin also provides an opportunity to push the boundaries of the established links between participation and the design and implementation of responses to a changing climate. Contributing to one of the main themes of the symposium, this article argues that the focus on collaboration and compromise within studies of governance and participation overlooks both the reality of conflict and its potentially positive effects. Addressing this requires particular attention to how power relationships influence processes of governance, and the role of civil society in balancing the influence of the private sector on the state. It also calls for a better understanding of conflict and collaboration as mutually re-enforcing elements of an ongoing and dynamic political process. Together, the elements of this critique help to build a more nuanced view of participatory urban governance: one that both better describes and may better facilitate the ability of urban populations to collectively, effectively and rapidly respond to the challenges of a changing climate. Copyright (c) 2010 The Author. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research(c) 2010 Joint Editors and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Urban Climate Adaptation and Leadership

“…Given the impact and importance of these approaches, many urban practitioners see the potential for participation and partnerships in building and implementing urban adaptation programs (Aylett, 2010;Kithiia and Dowling, 2010;Rosenzweig and Solecki, 2010;Anguelovski and Carmin, 2011). Processes that involve local stakeholders can shape government decisions (Shackley and Deanwood, 2002) while promoting strategies and policies that are suited to local realities and experiences (van Aalst et al, 2008).…”

Nature-Based Solutions Accelerating Urban Sustainability Transitions in Cities: Lessons from Dresden, Genk and Stockholm Cities

“…Civil society-led transition initiatives have been examined closely by scholars to assess their transformative potential, and it is the local understanding and local knowledge that civil society has that catalyzes the "tailoring to local context" and consequently leads to a fast-paced realization of new ideas and new approaches for more socially responsible governance (Aylett 2010(Aylett , 2013. Civil society can advocate for more radical and progressive ideas rather than "returning to old ideals" (cf.…”

Climate justice in lieu of climate change: a sustainable approach to respond to the climate change injustice and an awakening of the environmental movement

“…The question arises that who should pay the price of consequences of the global warming (Aylett 2010) and how to ensure the equal treatment in policy making, inclusivity of all vulnerable groups and fair distribution of resources to respond to the impact of climate change. The answer is climate justice framework, and its first success is in acknowledging the existing injustice toward those who contributed the least in the causing, as well as in safeguarding their rights with strong evidencebased policy framework.…”