2009
DOI: 10.3182/20090630-4-es-2003.00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conflict Detection Metrics for Aircraft Sense and Avoid Systems

Abstract: Abstract:The task of an airborne collision avoidance system is to continuously evaluate the risk of collision and in the case of too high risk initiate an evasive action. The traditional way to assess risk is to focus on a critical point of time. A recently proposed alternative is to evaluate the cumulated risk over time. It is the purpose of this contribution to evaluate the difference between these two concepts and also to validate an approximate method for computing the cumulated risk, suitable for real-tim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 The concept of CAS, including the discussion of the conflict detection issues with other aircrafts and anti-collision maneuvers of the UA were described by various authors. 11,12,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Related tasks concern stationary (ground) obstacle avoidance. The issue was discussed in the works of Kang 22 and Watanabe et al 23 Among the most important works, it is necessary to mention those within the frame of the SESAR 1 program and the MID-air collision avoidance system (MIDCAS) project.…”
Section: Development Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 The concept of CAS, including the discussion of the conflict detection issues with other aircrafts and anti-collision maneuvers of the UA were described by various authors. 11,12,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Related tasks concern stationary (ground) obstacle avoidance. The issue was discussed in the works of Kang 22 and Watanabe et al 23 Among the most important works, it is necessary to mention those within the frame of the SESAR 1 program and the MID-air collision avoidance system (MIDCAS) project.…”
Section: Development Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This event probability is then compared to a certain threshold above which the aircraft is deemed to be in collision. These probabilities can be estimated using approximate analytical solution [5], numerical approximation [39,40], or Monte Carlo methods [13,41,42]. The expected utility is another approach used to develop a risk alerting system that accounts for future changes in alerts and the responses to them [43].…”
Section: Collision Risk Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probabilistic methods for conflict resolution requiring the calculation of metrics like the Probability of Conflict (P c ) have been discussed in [5]. Nordlund and Gustafsson [20] noted the huge number of simulations required to get sufficient reliability for small risks and suggested an approach that reduced the three dimensional problem to a one dimensional integral along piecewise straight paths [21], [22]. More recently, Jilkov et al have extended a method developed by Blom and Bakker [23] and estimated P c using multiple models for aircraft trajectory prediction [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%