2011
DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2011.538968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conflict management systems in subsidiaries of non-union multinational organisations located in the Republic of Ireland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the degree of formality may differ across respondents' organizations, one thing is clear-most of them seek direct control of grievance management internally rather than involving a third party (e.g., trade unions or external bodies for intervention). This finding echoes those revealed in the studies of other national contexts (e.g., Doherty and Teague (2011) on foreign MNCs in Ireland).…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Grievance Managementsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…While the degree of formality may differ across respondents' organizations, one thing is clear-most of them seek direct control of grievance management internally rather than involving a third party (e.g., trade unions or external bodies for intervention). This finding echoes those revealed in the studies of other national contexts (e.g., Doherty and Teague (2011) on foreign MNCs in Ireland).…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Grievance Managementsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Of importance here are innovations in collective bargaining and associated new dispute resolution mechanisms, such as 'interest-based bargaining', 'collective mediation', fact-finding, the early facilitation of negotiations by an independent conciliator (a practice sometimes referred to as 'assisted bargaining' (Advisory Conciliation and Arbitration Service [ACAS] 2009), brain-storming and related problem-solving techniques, mediation by a party who may also be empowered to arbitrate ('med -arb'), mini-trials, proper arbitration and the proactive handling of change management. Some of these techniques may also be applied to group-based conflict in non-unionized firms, although such firms, especially of US origin, may resist recognizing conflicts as a group phenomenon in any respect and may seek to disaggregate them into individual grievances and deal with them only on that basis (Doherty 2011). Conflict management systems encompassing multiple forms of group or collective ADR are also contemplated in the literature, although less commonly than in the case of systems of this kind that address individual employment conflict (see, for example, Ury et al 1993).…”
Section: Adr In Work and Employment Disputesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Another source of survey data on conflict resolution in workplaces derives from Doherty & Teague's survey of eighty-three non-union multinational firms (Doherty & Teague, 2012). Table 4 reports the results.…”
Section: Influences On the Adoption Of Individual And Group Adr Practmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The practices in the non-union multinationals all appeared to focus on the resolution of conflict involving individual employees. Doherty & Teague (2012) emphasised that only a minority of the firms surveyed (about 25 per cent) used a wide variety of conflict management practices, implying that CMSs were again not widely prevalent in multinationals. One of the principal reasons given for this was that managers at the subsidiary level in multinationals avoided fostering innovation in this area of HR for fear of drawing attention to problems or concerns about conflict in the workplace (Doherty & Teague, 2012).…”
Section: Influences On the Adoption Of Individual And Group Adr Practmentioning
confidence: 99%