2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4266(01)00176-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conflict of interest in commercial bank security underwritings: Canadian evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 Hebb and Fraser (2002) show evidence of certification effects by commercial banks when studying the Canadian 15 Gande et al (1999) provide further evidence on the effects of the entry of Section 20 subsidiaries in the security underwriting market, showing that they have favored the reduction of underwriter spreads and ex-ante yields, and proportionally more so for lower-rated and smaller issues. 16 A related issue is studied by Narayanan et al (2004), who show that, in order to signal that they are not willing to exploit potential conflicts of interest to their advantage, banks acting as underwriters to their clients predominantly co-manage with a high reputation non-lending institution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…17 Hebb and Fraser (2002) show evidence of certification effects by commercial banks when studying the Canadian 15 Gande et al (1999) provide further evidence on the effects of the entry of Section 20 subsidiaries in the security underwriting market, showing that they have favored the reduction of underwriter spreads and ex-ante yields, and proportionally more so for lower-rated and smaller issues. 16 A related issue is studied by Narayanan et al (2004), who show that, in order to signal that they are not willing to exploit potential conflicts of interest to their advantage, banks acting as underwriters to their clients predominantly co-manage with a high reputation non-lending institution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…See, for example, Ber, Yafeh, and Yosha (2001) for evidence from Israel, Hebb and Fraser (2002) for evidence from Canada, Konishi (2002) for evidence from Japan, and Hebb and Fraser (2003) for evidence from the United Kingdom. See, for example, Ber, Yafeh, and Yosha (2001) for evidence from Israel, Hebb and Fraser (2002) for evidence from Canada, Konishi (2002) for evidence from Japan, and Hebb and Fraser (2003) for evidence from the United Kingdom.…”
Section: Seasoned Equity Offeringsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research department, under law, is independent of the deal-making process (CSI, 2003a). Over time, a body of literature has emerged focusing on how each of these departments, independently, play the role they do in stock market transactions (Hebb & Fraser, 2002).…”
Section: Full-service Investment Dealers and Boutique Banksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The very nature of investment dealers, as one-stop-shopping centers for corporate financing and stock market trading, has been viewed by commentators and industry regulators as vulnerable to conflict of interest (Thornton, 2002). However, a recent study on the subject finds little evidence of actual conflict of interest for full-service investment dealers and banks (Hebb & Fraser, 2002), the reason being the stringent regulations that are pursued within the securities industry (DFC, 2002).…”
Section: Canadian Investment Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation