1985
DOI: 10.1002/crq.39019850707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conflict resolution in child protection and adoption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Critics of the system argue that authoritative and unilateral action by caseworkers undermines the therapeutic goals of the child protective process (Chandler 1985;Mayer 1984). Concerned that unilateral decision making by caseworkers disempowers famih'es, many of these critics advocate using third party mediators in the child protective services system.…”
Section: Caseworker Framing Practicesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Critics of the system argue that authoritative and unilateral action by caseworkers undermines the therapeutic goals of the child protective process (Chandler 1985;Mayer 1984). Concerned that unilateral decision making by caseworkers disempowers famih'es, many of these critics advocate using third party mediators in the child protective services system.…”
Section: Caseworker Framing Practicesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While critics of the system (Chandler 1985;Mayer 1984) contend that parents ar~" rarely involved in the decision-making process, hitherto no study has empirically documented the degree to which caseworkers and parents negotiate decision making in the child protective process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…59 One of the most important goals of child protection mediation is to improve the relationship of the parties. 60 Child Protection Mediators work in the context of ongoing relationships that have the potential for future disputes and offer participants ways to deal with their particular problems.…”
Section: Child Protection Mediationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research and commentary on the use of mediation in CP cases dates back to the mid 1980s, although there were ad hoc attempts at using CP mediation prior to that period. The first articles proposing mediation reviewed then-current literature on child welfare and speculated about how mediation might be used in this context (Mayer, 1984;Oran, Creamer, and Libow, 1984;Wiig, 1984, Wildgoose, 1987. As mediation pilot projects were developed in Denver, Los Angeles, and Hartford in the United States and in Toronto and Victoria in Canada, as well as in other areas, research started to document the implementation and outcomes of mediation in CP cases (Golten, 1986;Center for Policy Research, 1992;Wildgoose and Maresca, 1994;Campbell and Rodenburgh, 1994).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%