2010
DOI: 10.1201/ebk1439834978-c6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conflicting Benefits and Hazards of Hospital-Style Bed Rails

Abstract: • This is a conference paper. ABSTRACTThis paper reviews the design and use of hospital-style bed rails. Rails were originally used as a safety feature for psychiatric patients at risk of falling in the 1800s. There are benefits, for example security in transit, facilitating repositioning, but also hazards, including deaths and injuries associated with entrapment. The developments in the technological specification of hospital beds (electric) has increased with their functionality. However, a survey in Englan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only two of the randomly selected residents at one low care RACF (F7) used a bedstick/pole. However, as can be seen in Table 2 , bed side-rails, which have also been associated with patient safety issues such as entrapment and falls ( Hignett and Masud, 2006 ; Capezuti et al, 2008 ; Hignett, 2010 ), were fitted to a majority of beds at high care and high care/low care facilities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only two of the randomly selected residents at one low care RACF (F7) used a bedstick/pole. However, as can be seen in Table 2 , bed side-rails, which have also been associated with patient safety issues such as entrapment and falls ( Hignett and Masud, 2006 ; Capezuti et al, 2008 ; Hignett, 2010 ), were fitted to a majority of beds at high care and high care/low care facilities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of rails to prevent wandering is inappropriate and ineffective [23] but is reported in previous studies [14,24]. These reasons illustrate the risk averse culture [3,11] and a care dichotomy in the care of older people between ensuring the safety and maintaining independence and freedom (including taking risks) [25]. It would be preferable for the use of rails to be a shared decision between staff and patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This resulted in a divergence of design/configuration of rails with bed controls incorporated into rails in the USA but designed as a cable-pendant or flexible arm panels in the UK [3]. Rails have a range of functions including safety in transit, comfort and security, a physical barrier and reminder of the bed perimeters, and supporting mobility [4,5] for turning and repositioning [6] and transferring in/out of the bed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[NPSA, 2007] Using medical metal bed rails had collective benefits and weighed against the risks for elderly. [Hignett, S. 2010]. Using medical metal side rails reduced dramatically from almost patients to around 13%.…”
Section: -Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%