2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conflicting results of serological, PCR and microscopic methods clarify the various risk levels of canine babesiosis in Slovakia: A complex approach to Babesia canis diagnostics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In BLAST Majlathova et al 2011;Kubelova et al 2013). B. canis was previously reported from the CR; however, all cases were in dogs with a history of travel to endemic areas (Kucera 1992;Svobodova and Svobodova 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In BLAST Majlathova et al 2011;Kubelova et al 2013). B. canis was previously reported from the CR; however, all cases were in dogs with a history of travel to endemic areas (Kucera 1992;Svobodova and Svobodova 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this, one can assume that the spread of B. canis follows the natural distribution of its vector. However, the data on B. canis infection in dogs or ticks in areas of Slovakia and Austria adjacent to the borders of the Czech Republic are either absent, or infection was Majlathova et al 2011;Kubelova et al 2013;Halos et al 2014;Pantchev et al 2015). Recent phylogenetic studies suggested intraspecies diversity of B. canis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). In 1/45 ticks (prevalence but the specificity of this method is low due to antigenic cross reactivity [5,6]. This method also fails to determine whether an ongoing infection is involved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7]. Despite the low recovery of parasites at low parasitaemia, the microscopic examination of blood smears is still one of the most frequently used methods owing to its simplicity and availability [5]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional benefit of these tests, often with in-kind support provided by the manufacturers, has been an increase in the number of cross-sectional serosurveys of CVBDs around the world, which have greatly furthered our understanding of their epidemiology and geographical distribution [41,42]. Nevertheless, it should be remembered that such tests also have limitations in terms of sensitivity (e.g., acute infections prior to antibody response) and specificity (e.g., cross-reactions between organisms), and some clinically significant diseases (e.g., acute babesiosis) are still probably best diagnosed by microscopy [43,44].…”
Section: Paradigm 2: Maintain the (Clinical) Vigilancementioning
confidence: 99%