Conflicts between employee preferences and ergonomic recommendations in shift scheduling: regulation based on consent is not sufficient

Abstract

ObjectiveContribution to the discussion of the role of participation/consent of employees in working hours regulation. Methods Exploratory analysis of conflicts between preferences of employees and ergonomic recommendations in shift scheduling by analysing a large number of participative shift scheduling projects. ResultsThe analysis showed that very often the pursuit of higher income played the major role in the decision making process of employees and employees preferred working hours in conflict with health and safety principles. Conclusions First, the consent of employees or the works council alone does not ensure ergonomically sound schedules. Besides consent, risk assessment procedures seem to be a promising but difficult approach. Secondly, more research is necessary to check the applicability of recommendations under various settings, to support the risk assessment processes and to improve regulatory approaches to working hours. Resumo Objetivo

Health effects of transitions in work schedule, workhours and overtime in a prospective cohort study

“…In this respect, it is possible that, despite a reduction in workhours, the women in this study still experienced negative effects of a double burden and therefore became psychologically distressed. In this view, a potentially important confounder is whether changes in worktime arrangements were forced upon the employee, more likely leading to negative effects, or whether they were the worker's own choice, possibly leading to more positive effects (39,40). For example, an obligation to reduce the amount of workhours because of company restructuring can be an important source of psychological distress.…”

Biological Clocks and Shift Work: Circadian Dysregulation and Potential Long-term Effects

“…These considerations have to be weighed against the favorable aspects of flexibility for the worker, his/her family and social needs. Ergonomic changes in shift schedules should be chosen, which may be preventative and may reduce the incidence of late detrimental health effects [17,65,107,108].…”

Rethinking shiftwork: mid‐life nurses making it work!

“…Nursing and Health Sciences Research Consortium 2000;Ellis and Pompili 2002;West, Boughton, and Byrnes 2009) and occupational health and safety (cf. Siebenaler and McGovern 1991;Gartner 2004;Pisarski et al 2008). Similarly, the few studies that have reported nurses' views of shiftwork also predominantly report their dissatisfaction with shiftwork (cf.…”

“…Nursing and Health Sciences Research Consortium 2000; Ellis and Pompili 2002; West, Boughton, and Byrnes 2009) and occupational health and safety (cf. Siebenaler and McGovern 1991; Gartner 2004; Pisarski et al. 2008).…”