2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3975(01)00380-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confluency and strong normalizability of call-by-value λμ-calculus

Abstract: This paper proves the confluency and the strong normalizability of the call-by-value Aicalculus with the domain-free style. The confluency of the system is proved by improving the parallel reduction method of Baba, Hirolawa and Fujita. The strong normalizability is proved by using the modified CPS-translation, which preserves the typa.bility and the reduction relation. This paper defines the class of the reductions whose strictness is preserved by the modified CPS-translation to prove the strong normalizabilit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use the notion of augmentations borrowed from [5] to prevent erasing-continuation of the CPS-translation. By using the notion of augmentations, we translate each 1^-term into a A/i-term of the same meaning in which any ^-abstraction subterm fia.e contains a variable a me.…”
Section: (Subject Reduction Property) Ift:t\-aa Is Provable and T \mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the notion of augmentations borrowed from [5] to prevent erasing-continuation of the CPS-translation. By using the notion of augmentations, we translate each 1^-term into a A/i-term of the same meaning in which any ^-abstraction subterm fia.e contains a variable a me.…”
Section: (Subject Reduction Property) Ift:t\-aa Is Provable and T \mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, we elaborate a syntactic translation that satisfies a kind of soundness with respect to reduction. In the literature, we can find several proofs of strong normalizability by syntactic translations for call-by-value calculi with control operators [Nak03]…”
Section: Proof By Prop 213 [[M ]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Parigot's λ µ-calculus, it is well known that the naive parallel reduction is not preserved under substitution [BHF01]. Instead, a complex parallel reduction that moves subterms located very deeply in a term towards the outside is needed [BHF01,Nak03,GKM12]. For λ ::catch we experience another issue.…”
Section: Confluencementioning
confidence: 99%