2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-022-09338-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confocal magnetron sputtering deposition of Cu/AZO bilayer structures: effect of Cu thickness on microstructural and optoelectronic properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 57 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sheet resistance and thickness data in Table 1 show that the electrical conductivity, σ = (R s t) -1 , is much higher for SnO 2 (10 2 S/cm) than for WO 3 -A (10 -2 S/cm) and WO 3 -B (10 -1 S/cm). For the SnO 2 /WO 3 samples, the total resistance agrees with a parallel connection of the respective resistances: R bilayer = (1/R SnO 2 + 1/ R WO 3 ) -1 ≈ R SnO 2 , with a clear predominance of the most conductive material as reported for other bilayers [21]. Regarding photosensitivity, the SnO 2 layer and the SnO 2 /WO 3 bilayers have not presented appreciable changes in conductivity under dark and light conditions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The sheet resistance and thickness data in Table 1 show that the electrical conductivity, σ = (R s t) -1 , is much higher for SnO 2 (10 2 S/cm) than for WO 3 -A (10 -2 S/cm) and WO 3 -B (10 -1 S/cm). For the SnO 2 /WO 3 samples, the total resistance agrees with a parallel connection of the respective resistances: R bilayer = (1/R SnO 2 + 1/ R WO 3 ) -1 ≈ R SnO 2 , with a clear predominance of the most conductive material as reported for other bilayers [21]. Regarding photosensitivity, the SnO 2 layer and the SnO 2 /WO 3 bilayers have not presented appreciable changes in conductivity under dark and light conditions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%