1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf02101707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformal blocks and generalized theta functions

Abstract: Let M(r) be the moduli space of rank r vector bundles with trivial determinant on a Riemann surface X . This space carries a natural line bundle, the determinant line bundle L . We describe a canonical isomorphism of the space of global sections of L^k with a space known in conformal field theory as the ``space of conformal blocks", which is defined in terms of representations of the Lie algebra sl(r, C((z))).Comment: 43 pages, Plain Te

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
281
0
4

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(288 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
281
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It also follows from Theorem 2.10 that to conclude the desired formula it suffices to consider the case that C is totally degenerate; we choose the totally degenerate curve obtained by gluing two copies of P 1 to each other three times. By Proposition 3.5, and the fact [18, p. 206] that a torally indigenous bundle on P 1 with three marked points is determined by its radii, we find that this number is the same as the number of dormant torally indigenous bundles on P 1 with three marked points, which is p 3 Remark 4.8. One natural question which is not addressed by these techniques, due to the necessity of working level by level, is the relationship between the strata of different levels.…”
Section: Theorem 47mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…It also follows from Theorem 2.10 that to conclude the desired formula it suffices to consider the case that C is totally degenerate; we choose the totally degenerate curve obtained by gluing two copies of P 1 to each other three times. By Proposition 3.5, and the fact [18, p. 206] that a torally indigenous bundle on P 1 with three marked points is determined by its radii, we find that this number is the same as the number of dormant torally indigenous bundles on P 1 with three marked points, which is p 3 Remark 4.8. One natural question which is not addressed by these techniques, due to the necessity of working level by level, is the relationship between the strata of different levels.…”
Section: Theorem 47mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…8.2] we see that G-invariant line bundles onR are in bijection with line bundles on M r (C), sô L must be a power of the pullback of L . Now, the sections of L ⊗n on M r (C) are in bijection with the sections on M ss r (C) [2,Prop. 8.3], which are in bijection with G-invariant sections of the pullback onR ss = R [2, Lem.…”
Section: Appendix a Some General Results On The Verschiebungmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each simple root α i , we choose a non-trivial additive subgroup x i of U + such that a λ x i (b)a −λ = x i a α i ,λ b holds for all λ ∈ Λ, a ∈ C × , b ∈ C. Then there is a unique morphism ϕ i : SL 2 Let N G (T ) be the normalizer of T in G and let W = N G (T )/T be the Weyl group of (G, T ). Each element s i normalizes T ; its class s i modulo T is called a simple reflection.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The affine Grassmannian H is the set of C-points of an ind-scheme defined over C (see [2] for H = GL n or SL n and Chapter 13 of [20] for H simple). This means, in particular, that H is the direct limit of a system…”
Section: The Affine Grassmannianmentioning
confidence: 99%