2020
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.101.062146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformal invariance in the nonperturbative renormalization group: A rationale for choosing the regulator

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We attribute the inaccuracies concerning the numerical values of the exponents to the low level of the implemented truncation and point out that the case of d = 2 is the least favorable for the present approach due to relatively large values of the anomalous dimension. [19,20,22,23] The accuracy of our method is expected to increase upon raising d. It is nonetheless doubtless from our above results that the second-order DE is able to capture nonanalytic behavior of the critical exponents at (d, N ) = (2, 2). In the following section we use an analogous strategy in an attempt to identify the nonanalyticities at d > 2 expected to occur along the C-H line.…”
Section: Dimensionality D =mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We attribute the inaccuracies concerning the numerical values of the exponents to the low level of the implemented truncation and point out that the case of d = 2 is the least favorable for the present approach due to relatively large values of the anomalous dimension. [19,20,22,23] The accuracy of our method is expected to increase upon raising d. It is nonetheless doubtless from our above results that the second-order DE is able to capture nonanalytic behavior of the critical exponents at (d, N ) = (2, 2). In the following section we use an analogous strategy in an attempt to identify the nonanalyticities at d > 2 expected to occur along the C-H line.…”
Section: Dimensionality D =mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…For the less complex case of Ising symmetry-breaking (N = 1) the computation was performed [20] even up to order ∂ 6 . In addition to numbers (including errorbars), these studies delivered insights pointing towards rapid convergence of the DE, emphasizing (and clarifying [23]) the role of the so-called principle of minimal sensitivity (PMS) [24]. The latter amounts to demanding that the analyzed quantity (e.g.…”
Section: Functional Rg and The Derivative Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a side note, we point out a recent proposal for an alternative way to fix the regulator dependence for conformally invariant theories, the principle of maximal conformality (PMC) [71]. Conformal invariance implies a set of (modified) Ward identities associated with scale and special conformal transformations (SCT).…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obtained value of ν −1 ⊥ carries a weak dependence on α. In accord with the principle of minimal sensitivity 72,73 (PMS) one chooses α so that ν −1 ⊥ is locally stationary with respect to variation of α. Our results for ν ⊥ depending on N, d and m are presented in Figs.…”
Section: B Local Potential Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%