We provide a control-theoretic perspective on optimal tensor algorithms for minimizing a convex function in a finite-dimensional Euclidean space. Given a function $$\varPhi : {\mathbb {R}}^d \rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}$$
Φ
:
R
d
→
R
that is convex and twice continuously differentiable, we study a closed-loop control system that is governed by the operators $$\nabla \varPhi $$
∇
Φ
and $$\nabla ^2 \varPhi $$
∇
2
Φ
together with a feedback control law $$\lambda (\cdot )$$
λ
(
·
)
satisfying the algebraic equation $$(\lambda (t))^p\Vert \nabla \varPhi (x(t))\Vert ^{p-1} = \theta $$
(
λ
(
t
)
)
p
‖
∇
Φ
(
x
(
t
)
)
‖
p
-
1
=
θ
for some $$\theta \in (0, 1)$$
θ
∈
(
0
,
1
)
. Our first contribution is to prove the existence and uniqueness of a local solution to this system via the Banach fixed-point theorem. We present a simple yet nontrivial Lyapunov function that allows us to establish the existence and uniqueness of a global solution under certain regularity conditions and analyze the convergence properties of trajectories. The rate of convergence is $$O(1/t^{(3p+1)/2})$$
O
(
1
/
t
(
3
p
+
1
)
/
2
)
in terms of objective function gap and $$O(1/t^{3p})$$
O
(
1
/
t
3
p
)
in terms of squared gradient norm. Our second contribution is to provide two algorithmic frameworks obtained from discretization of our continuous-time system, one of which generalizes the large-step A-HPE framework of Monteiro and Svaiter (SIAM J Optim 23(2):1092–1125, 2013) and the other of which leads to a new optimal p-th order tensor algorithm. While our discrete-time analysis can be seen as a simplification and generalization of Monteiro and Svaiter (2013), it is largely motivated by the aforementioned continuous-time analysis, demonstrating the fundamental role that the feedback control plays in optimal acceleration and the clear advantage that the continuous-time perspective brings to algorithmic design. A highlight of our analysis is that we show that all of the p-th order optimal tensor algorithms that we discuss minimize the squared gradient norm at a rate of $$O(k^{-3p})$$
O
(
k
-
3
p
)
, which complements the recent analysis in Gasnikov et al. (in: COLT, PMLR, pp 1374–1391, 2019), Jiang et al. (in: COLT, PMLR, pp 1799–1801, 2019) and Bubeck et al. (in: COLT, PMLR, pp 492–507, 2019).