1974
DOI: 10.1021/ja00809a033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformation and synthesis of diketopiperazines. 3,4-Dehydroproline anhydride

Abstract: On the Conformation and Synthesis of Diketopiperazines.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1975
1975
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, the different asphericity of the atoms in the glycine residue and the proline residue is responsible for the different carbonyl bond lengths obtained from the full-data refinement. In addition, it is interesting to note that the proline carbonyl bond length from the full-data refinement of 3,4-dehydroproline anhydride (Karle, Ottenheym & Witkop, 1974) is exactly the same, 1.228 A, as those obtained from both full-data refinements of proline DKP compounds. In a similar way, all the C-C bonds except CIB-C1 become virtually identical at 1.518 A in the high-angle refinement while the full-data refinement showed C~-C~ to be distinctly shorter at 1.504 (3) A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Clearly, the different asphericity of the atoms in the glycine residue and the proline residue is responsible for the different carbonyl bond lengths obtained from the full-data refinement. In addition, it is interesting to note that the proline carbonyl bond length from the full-data refinement of 3,4-dehydroproline anhydride (Karle, Ottenheym & Witkop, 1974) is exactly the same, 1.228 A, as those obtained from both full-data refinements of proline DKP compounds. In a similar way, all the C-C bonds except CIB-C1 become virtually identical at 1.518 A in the high-angle refinement while the full-data refinement showed C~-C~ to be distinctly shorter at 1.504 (3) A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…A comparison of the dihedral angle between the planes through the atoms [N(2),C(1),C(2)J and the least-squares plane through the atoms [N( 1),C(2),N(2),C(4)] in 2 (36°) and the C(l)-mercapto-C(3)-methylene compound23 (23°) contradicts the conclusion of Karle et al 22 that addition of a disulfide bridge to the dioxopiperazine ring "does not change appreciably the geometry of the ring". Karle et al came to this conclusion from a comparison of the "fold" in cyc7o-(t.-Pro-L-Leu) and 3,4-dehydroproline anhydride on one hand and several natural epidithiodioxopiperazines on the other hand, compounds which, in our opinion, are not comparable for the conclusion to be drawn, since the disulfide bridge is not the only factor in which they are different from each other.…”
Section: Mementioning
confidence: 82%
“…We are aware of only two previously published crystal structure determinations of N-methylated diketopiperazines: cyclo(Sar)2,27a the cyclic dipeptide of A-methylglycine, and Benedetti, Marsh, Goodman 22) 5( 33) 5( 12) 5( 13) 5 (23) 0, 63 822 (24) 112 216 (30) 48 657 ( 22) 732 ( 15) 667 ( 19) 483 ( 14)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%