1980
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)86165-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformation changes of actin during formation of filaments and paracrystals and upon interaction with DNase I, cytochalasin B, and phalloidin.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The small differences in the molecular dimensions of our subunit models and the atomic structure ofthe actin molecule, i.e., 5.5 x -6.0 x -3.2 nm versus 5.5 x 5.5 x 3.5 nm in Kabsch et al . (1990), may primarily be due to conformational changes occurring upon formation of the actin-DNase I complex, or upon polymerization into filaments (Harwell et al, 1980;Holmes et al, 1990;Kabsch et al, 1990). Obviously, some of the differences may also be attributed to specimen preparation artifacts due to surface tension phenomena and the use ofnegative stain .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small differences in the molecular dimensions of our subunit models and the atomic structure ofthe actin molecule, i.e., 5.5 x -6.0 x -3.2 nm versus 5.5 x 5.5 x 3.5 nm in Kabsch et al . (1990), may primarily be due to conformational changes occurring upon formation of the actin-DNase I complex, or upon polymerization into filaments (Harwell et al, 1980;Holmes et al, 1990;Kabsch et al, 1990). Obviously, some of the differences may also be attributed to specimen preparation artifacts due to surface tension phenomena and the use ofnegative stain .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, major differences exist between the observations of Laliberté et al and the present ones. These authors obtained only actin paracrystals, and single filaments were not seen, suggesting that positive liposomes act like high divalent salt concentrations (Harwell et al, 1980). In addition, polymerization with liposomes follows much faster kinetics and does not lead to apparent defects in the helical symmetry.…”
Section: Assembly and Microscopic Structure Of Surfaceinduced Actin Polymersmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Despite structural and functional differences between Mg 2ϩ -and Ca 2ϩ -bound forms, Ca 2ϩbound actin does polymerize in solution, but this polymerization requires KCl and shows a long lag phase (Yasuda et al, 1996;Steinmetz et al, 1997). Actin polymerization in solution is classically thought to require the reduction of the net negative charge of the G-actin monomer by salts (Mg 2ϩ , K ϩ ) (Harwell et al, 1980). Here the polymerization of Ca 2ϩ -bound actin is obtained despite the absence of KCl.…”
Section: Assembly and Microscopic Structure Of Surfaceinduced Actin Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actin comprises 10% of neutrophil cytoplasmic protein (3) and has two interchangeable physical states with widely different polymerization potentials (4,5). G-actin exists primarily as a monomer due to the high critical concentration required for its polymerization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F-actin has a lower critical polymerization concentration and at the concentration of actin in cytoplasm, oligomers and polymers form. The presence of high concentrations of potassium and magnesium in the cell favors the F-actin conformation (5), whereas, cyto-plasmic proteins such as profilin stabilize G-actin (1,6). Thus, a pool of G-actin monomers exist in equilibrium with F-actin oligomers and polymers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%