2019
DOI: 10.1201/9780367813529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformation of Carbohydrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
53
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we modeled a peptidoglycan octamer with a NAG‐NAM(‐L‐Ala‐γ‐D‐Glu‐L‐Dap‐D‐Ala‐D‐Ala) disaccharide repeating unit since λ lysozyme has been shown to be more active for gram‐negative bacterial cell wall lysis . According to theoretical and experimental analysis, the glycosidic dihedral angles of the NAM‐β(1–4)‐NAG unit are similar to a NAG‐β(1–4)‐NAG unit (chitin‐like structure) whereas the conformational map is more restricted in a NAG‐β(1–4)‐NAM unit . Therefore, we used the φ , ψ :−84°, 102° glycosidic angles for the NAM‐NAG disaccharide, which have been previously determined from free‐energy calculations .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, we modeled a peptidoglycan octamer with a NAG‐NAM(‐L‐Ala‐γ‐D‐Glu‐L‐Dap‐D‐Ala‐D‐Ala) disaccharide repeating unit since λ lysozyme has been shown to be more active for gram‐negative bacterial cell wall lysis . According to theoretical and experimental analysis, the glycosidic dihedral angles of the NAM‐β(1–4)‐NAG unit are similar to a NAG‐β(1–4)‐NAG unit (chitin‐like structure) whereas the conformational map is more restricted in a NAG‐β(1–4)‐NAM unit . Therefore, we used the φ , ψ :−84°, 102° glycosidic angles for the NAM‐NAG disaccharide, which have been previously determined from free‐energy calculations .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there have been many studies of the chemical structure of peptidoglycans, there is no consensus on the preferred 3D molecular structure adopted or its arrangement in the cell wall. [33][34][35][36][37] previously determined from free-energy calculations. 16 Glycosidic angles for the NAG-NAM disaccharide were taken from the NMR structure of a peptidoglycan monomer fragment 36…”
Section: Modeling Of the λ Lysozyme-peptidoglycan Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For glycans, the torsion angles ϕ andψ are defined differently than in proteins (Figure ). In NMR (as opposed to crystallographic) studies, the torsional angle ϕ and ψ between two residues are generally given by ϕ (H1 (i‐1) ‐C1 (i‐1) ‐O1 (i‐1) ‐C x(i) ), and ψ (C1 (i‐1) ‐O1 (i‐1) ‐C x(i) ‐H x(i) ). Glycans are usually found in preferred orientations, but typically, have more than one preferred orientation for each linkage .…”
Section: Glycan Solution Structure Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to classify our linear saccharides, helical parameter, n (number of residues per pitch) and h (advancement per monomer unit) were calculated according to the def-inition in the following references. [113,52,115] According to Rees'[115] classification of perfectly periodic helices our studied sugars fall into the ribbon family n=2-±4 and h=4-6Å…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbohydrates, unlike their protein counterparts, simply do not have a backbone and as opposed to proteins which are linear polymers, carbohydrates are often branched. Since these molecules are polyalcohols, there are various plausible linkage points such as 1-1, 1-2, 1-3, 1-4 and 1-6 [113](see Figure 1.1) and this is further complicated by the fact that monosaccharide residues exist in two anomeric configurations, namely α (where the OH group at C1 is axial) and β (where the OH group at C1 is equatorial) with respect to the 4 C 1 chair conformation. In the past, our group has put significant effort in understanding the conformational preferences of oligsaccharies by developing and using a fast sugar structure prediction software as well as by carrying out molecular dynamics simulation studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%