1973
DOI: 10.1002/9780470122822.ch7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformational Adaptability in Enzymes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 796 publications
(185 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The monophasic Michaelis–Menten relationship of the monomeric epimerase demonstrated the absence of such artefacts and the requirement for a dimeric structure to explain the regulation. The difference in V max values among different forms of the epimerase is a reflection of change of conformation (Table 1) [29,30]. The functional distinction between native and monomeric epimerase was also apparent from the inhibitory pattern with 5′‐UMP (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The monophasic Michaelis–Menten relationship of the monomeric epimerase demonstrated the absence of such artefacts and the requirement for a dimeric structure to explain the regulation. The difference in V max values among different forms of the epimerase is a reflection of change of conformation (Table 1) [29,30]. The functional distinction between native and monomeric epimerase was also apparent from the inhibitory pattern with 5′‐UMP (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such conformational changes reduce enzyme flexibility, thereby enhancing stability. Citri (1973) reviewed the effect of ligands on enzyme thermostability and concluded that stabilization was prima-facie evidence that a conformational change had occurred.…”
Section: Sfructurul and Thermodynamic Considerutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H‐isotope exchange experiments 13, 14 maintained this concept until the advent of molecular dynamics simulations and high‐resolution proton NMR measurements on proteins. In an elegant review published in 1973, Citri 15 highlighted “the deep conceptual difference between a selective and an instructive role for the ligand”. Here, the concept of “fluctuation fit” proposed by Straub and Szabolcsi was summarized as an alternative theory, which explicitly postulates a ligand‐induced shift in the equilibrium of the enzyme, which fluctuates between various conformational states, while the substrate stabilizes the conformation which is optimal for binding and catalysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%