1974
DOI: 10.1021/jo00931a037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformational analysis. CV. Syn-diaxial methyl carboethoxy interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TLC (EtOAc:hexanes, 1:9 v/v): R f = 0.50; 1 H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ 6.46 (s, 2H), 4.24 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 4H), 1.28 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 6H); 13 C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ 164.0, 135.2, 134.0, 61.5, 14.1. Other spectral data matched those previously reported …”
Section: Experimental Sectionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…TLC (EtOAc:hexanes, 1:9 v/v): R f = 0.50; 1 H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ 6.46 (s, 2H), 4.24 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 4H), 1.28 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 6H); 13 C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ 164.0, 135.2, 134.0, 61.5, 14.1. Other spectral data matched those previously reported …”
Section: Experimental Sectionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…With respect to both dienes, maleic anhydride (MA; 10), 1,1-carbethoxyethene (CEE; 11), 19 and dimethyl fumarate (DMFu; 12) were of similar reactivities (Tables 1 and 2, entries 1, 2, and 3). Maleic anhydride benefits from a diminished steric encumbrance and a lower LUMO (Figure 5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can thus conclude that the electronics is the controlling element in the reactivity of these dienophiles and not steric effects. Steric effects may, however, lower the reactivity of 20 with respect to DEE (19).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…shaped E and F of which are sterically very demanding. For the chair-like conformations C and D, we can estimate the total destabilization energy E D from the experimentally known values for the 1,3-syn-diaxial interactions, assuming that Ϫ∆G°M e/COOH ഠ Ϫ∆G°M e/COOEt ϭ 3.2 kcal·mol Ϫ1 , [25] because Ϫ∆G°C OOH/H ഠ Ϫ∆G°C OOEt/H ഠ 1.2 kcal·mol Ϫ1 . [26] With Ϫ∆G°M e/H ϭ 1.6 kcal·mol Ϫ1 , [26] and Ϫ∆G°M e/Me ϭ 3.7 kcal·mol Ϫ1 , [27] we obtain: Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%