2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.carres.2007.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformational behaviour of glycomimetics: NMR and molecular modelling studies of the C-glycoside analogue of the disaccharide methyl β-d-galactopyranosyl-(1→3)-β-d-glucopyranoside

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4). The ensemble of major conformations observed correspond to a low-energy population in solution (35). In addition, the size of the binding site was maintained almost constant during the entire simulation (Fig.…”
Section: With Lacto-n-biosementioning
confidence: 93%
“…4). The ensemble of major conformations observed correspond to a low-energy population in solution (35). In addition, the size of the binding site was maintained almost constant during the entire simulation (Fig.…”
Section: With Lacto-n-biosementioning
confidence: 93%
“…4), and its associated stereoelectronic effects radically differentiate the conformational properties of glycosides from those of structures based on cyclohexane or those in which the linking oxygen is replaced by a methylene group (C-glycosides) [78]. Ultimately, the degree to which a force field is able to correctly reproduce the stability and conformation of the carbohydrate ring and the interactions between the rings depend on a delicate balance between inter- and intramolecular forces [28].…”
Section: Carbohydrate Force Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) in hexopyranoses. In fact, the weakening of 1–4 interactions (O6–O5), relative to 1–5 (O6–O4), prevents the accurate fitting of the rotational properties for this linkage [78,90]. Conversely, choosing not to use 1–4 scaling factors may cause a conflict with the treatment of non-bonded interactions in protein force fields.…”
Section: Carbohydrate Force Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As foundation for this study, the conformational behavior of compounds 1 and 2 ( Figure 1) in water solution deduced previously by combination of NMR experiments and molecular mechanics calculations was used. [9] The employed protocol involved the calculation of the potential energy maps for both compounds by using the Maestro package, [10] followed by the determination of the expected vicinal protonproton couplings (J) and nuclear Overhauser effects (NOEs) for the calculated population distribution. The theoretical data for the ensemble average was compared to the obtained experimental NMR data to validate the theoretical results and to estimate the actual population distribution in solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%