1998
DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.1998.9380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformational Change in an Anti-integrin Antibody: Structure of OPG2 Fab Bound to a β3 Peptide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Again, additional packing interactions between CDR H3 and hapten 3 are introduced as a result of this rearrangement. CDR H3 has also been shown to undergo significant conformational changes upon the binding of antigen in a number of affinity-matured antibodies ( ). In general, the movement of CDR H3 is not so large (<2 Å) in the affinity-matured antibodies as in the germline antibodies discussed here.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, additional packing interactions between CDR H3 and hapten 3 are introduced as a result of this rearrangement. CDR H3 has also been shown to undergo significant conformational changes upon the binding of antigen in a number of affinity-matured antibodies ( ). In general, the movement of CDR H3 is not so large (<2 Å) in the affinity-matured antibodies as in the germline antibodies discussed here.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Legitimacy of the antigen-induced models is debated. Supporting experiments include that: i) the circular polarization of fluorescence suggests that the disulfide bonds at the hinge region of the antibody are required to translate the conformational change from the F ab to the F c domain29; ii) X-ray crystallography reports a 15° conformation change of the F ab domains of OPG2 antibody by an antigen, β3 peptide, through carboxyl fragments of F ab domains30. Unfortunately, the small and diverse changes generated by the binding of antigens in most observed cases by crystallography cannot be generalized or identified with signaling3132333435.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, one could argue that we never deal with the binding of a single charged ligand to a protein, but that simultaneous, interacting equilibria are the rule when proteins and charged ligands are considered. Indeed, recent structural studies on Fab fragments directed against a variety of charged antigens have revealed that significant conformation changes can occur within the Fab as a consequence of antigen binding ( ). Similarly, other studies using intact monoclonal antibodies directed against fluorescein and lysozyme have revealed that secondary interactions external to the antibody active site can affect ligand binding efficiency, protein dynamics, and variable domain conformation ( ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%