Conformational changes after foaming in a protein‐based thermoplastic

Gavin, Chanelle; Lay, Mark C.; Verbeek, Casparus Johannes Reinhard

doi:10.1002/app.46005

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The different trends for water and TEG are not unexpected when considered with DMA and rheology results. Foaming further affected the secondary structure, which is consistent with previous studies . Typically, a reduction in random‐coiled structures was observed in conjunction with an increase in β‐sheets compared to ENTP.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 90%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The role of plasticizers during protein thermoplastic foaming

Gavin

Verbeek

Lay

2019

J of Applied Polymer Sci

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Protein thermoplastics, like Novatein, typically comprise a polymer, additives, and plasticizers. During foaming, the plasticizers performed different functions; triethylene glycol (TEG) affected the Tg of the polymer, while water altered the shear viscosity and urea the extensional viscosity. Water and urea also functioned as blowing agents; increasing urea increased the expansion ratio, while an increase in TEG and water decreased it. It was concluded that at this level of plasticization, phase separation occurred and that the plasticizers are most influential during late bubble growth and stabilization. Contrary to previous thought, increasing water had no effect on the Tg, but did lower the shear viscosity, while increasing TEG had the opposite effect. This enables the properties of protein thermoplastics to be tailored during development. During foaming, lower viscosity allows more time for gases to diffuse before the viscosity in the surrounding polymer increases, restricting bubble growth. At higher TEG content, the material is processed further above its Tg, slowing down stabilization and decreasing expansion. This study clarified the role of plasticizers during foaming and showed a decrease in random coils and β‐turns (measured by FT‐IR) with increasing expansion ratio. Knowledge of these mechanisms enables tailoring properties of protein thermoplastics foams during development. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 47781.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 90%

“…Foaming further affected the secondary structure, which is consistent with previous studies. 34,35 Typically, a reduction in random-coiled structures was observed in conjunction with an increase in β-sheets compared to ENTP.…”

Section: Chain Conformationmentioning

confidence: 99%