1968
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)93350-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformational Changes in Aspartate Transcarbamylase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After digestion for 20min, the effects of 2mM-ATP and 0.2mM-CTP on the reaction are negligible, in agreement with the results of McClintock & Markus (1968), and the specific activity of the solution is higher than at zero time (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Tryptic Hydrolysis Of Aspartate Transcarbamoylasesupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…After digestion for 20min, the effects of 2mM-ATP and 0.2mM-CTP on the reaction are negligible, in agreement with the results of McClintock & Markus (1968), and the specific activity of the solution is higher than at zero time (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Tryptic Hydrolysis Of Aspartate Transcarbamoylasesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It appeared that trypsin preferentially attacked the regulatory subunits of the enzyme. These and other studies (McClintock & Markus, 1968;Markus et al, 1971) indicated that an investigation of the tryptic digestion of native aspartate transcarbamoylase would be of interest with regard to the structure of the enzyme. Two catalytically active proteins differing from the native enzyme have been isolated from limited tryptic digests of the native enzyme, and some properties of these species are reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A large body of evidence indicates that the binding of nucleotides to r2 alters both tertiary structure and subunit interactions [cf. McClintock & Markus (1968), Cohlberg et al (1972), Hensley & Schachman, (1979), Lennick & Allewell (1981), and Honzatko et al (1982)], with CTP, which binds more tightly than ATP, generally having a larger effect. The dissociation heats necessarily include any contributions from structural changes in the protein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%