To gain more information on the manner of actin-myosin interaction, we examined how the motile properties of myosins II and V are affected by the modifications of the DNase I binding loop (D-loop) of actin, performed in two different ways, namely, the proteolytic digestion with subtilisin and the M47A point mutation. In an in vitro motility assay, both modifications significantly decreased the gliding velocity on myosin II-heavy meromyosin due to a weaker generated force but increased it on myosin V. On the other hand, single molecules of myosin V "walked" with the same velocity on both the wild-type and modified actins; however, the run lengths decreased sharply, correlating with a lower affinity of myosin for actin due to the D-loop modifications. The difference between the single-molecule and the ensemble measurements with myosin V indicates that in an in vitro motility assay the non-coordinated multiple myosin V molecules impose internal friction on each other via binding to the same actin filament, which is reduced by the weaker binding to the modified actins. These results show that the D-loop strongly modulates the force generation by myosin II and the processivity of myosin V, presumably affecting actin-myosin interaction in the actomyosin-ADP⅐P i state of both myosins. Subdomain 2 of actin, which contains the D-loop (residues 38 -52), slightly changes its conformation during actin polymerization and interacts with the C terminus of the adjacent subunit in actin filament (1, 2). This region is suggested to be important for actin-myosin interaction; it was found that binding of myosin II induces conformational changes in subdomain 2 (3, 4), whereas the proteolytic digestion of the D-loop inhibits actin-activated ATPase of myosin II-subfragment 1 (S1) 3 and decreases the velocity of actin filaments on myosin II-HMM in an in vitro motility assay (5, 6).However, although as many as 24 classes of myosin have already been found (7), the contribution of the D-loop to actinmyosin interaction has so far been studied only for myosin II. Although all myosins carry out their motor functions by interacting with actin filaments, each class has a different role in vivo. For example, myosin V is an intracellular transporter, which is different from the role of myosin II, engaged mainly in muscle contraction or the formation of contractile ring. The rate-limiting step in the ATPase cycle in the presence of actin is the phosphate release in the case of myosin II but ADP release in myosin V, which allows this motor to spend most of its ATPase cycle (Ͼ90%) strongly bound to actin. Furthermore, similarly to kinesin (8), two heads of myosin V work cooperatively, coordinating their biochemical cycles via internal load (9 -11). These characteristics enable myosin V to move processively on actin filaments (12), and recent studies indicate that, similarly to myosin II, the attachment of myosin V also induces conformational changes in the D-loop region of actin (13).Here, to determine whether the D-loop contributes to the interact...