1985
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1985.tb14854.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformational Changes in the Na/Proline Cotransporter of Intestinal Brush Bordersa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
1

Year Published

1986
1986
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Controversy exists as to the existence of a second glucose transporter protein in the small intestine similar to that observed in renal brush border membranes (51). A number of investigators have argued for the presence of two distinct transporters based on kinetic evidence (52)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57), whereas others have claimed that differences in Km can be explained by either differences in membrane fluidity (30) or changes in cis-Na+ concentration and resultant conforlnational changes in the transporter (58). In the present study, no firm conclusions could be drawn concerning this matter.…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Controversy exists as to the existence of a second glucose transporter protein in the small intestine similar to that observed in renal brush border membranes (51). A number of investigators have argued for the presence of two distinct transporters based on kinetic evidence (52)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57), whereas others have claimed that differences in Km can be explained by either differences in membrane fluidity (30) or changes in cis-Na+ concentration and resultant conforlnational changes in the transporter (58). In the present study, no firm conclusions could be drawn concerning this matter.…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…In vesicle studies specific binding of phlorizin to the glucose transporter rapidly achieves a maximal value at 2-45 sec (Chesney, Sacktor & Kleinzeller, 1974;Peerce & Wright, 1984), thereafter declining slowly due to dissipation of the initial Na + gradient (Toggenburger et al, 1982) or to reduced binding (Glossmann & Neville, 1972). In the intact intestinal mucosa specific binding is slower, as one would expect from the much greater unstirred layers, but is nevertheless faster than nonspecific binding (Fig.…”
Section: Time Dependence Of Bindingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Na+-D-glucose cotransport in calf kidney a functional molecular weight of 345,000, and for phlorizin binding in rabbit kidney functional molecular weights of 230,000 and 110,000 have been determined by target size analysis [23,31,34]. With amino acid specific reagents a M~ 75,000 polypeptide has been identified as a component of the intestinal transporter in rabbit [27,28] and with covalently binding D-glucose analogs and monoclonal antibodies 110, 18, 25, 26] M, 75,000 and 47,001) polypeptides have been shown to be components of the renal transporter in pig and rat. Furthermore, a cDNA coding for a M~ 73,080 polypeptide was cloned from rabbit intestine which was able to drastically increase Na+-D-glucose cotransport in oocytes from Xenopus laeuis after injection of the corresponding mRNA [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%