1996
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformational Changes of Three Periplasmic Receptors for Bacterial Chemotaxis and Transport: The Maltose-, Glucose/Galactose- and Ribose-binding Proteins.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

10
112
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
10
112
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Addition of ligand had no significant effect on R g or the molecular weight (Table V). These results can be compared with those obtained with three other periplasmic binding proteins (those specific for maltose, ribose, or glucose/galactose), all of which undergo a significant decrease in R g of ϳ0.1 nm upon binding ligand (24).…”
Section: Fhud2 Function In S Aureusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Addition of ligand had no significant effect on R g or the molecular weight (Table V). These results can be compared with those obtained with three other periplasmic binding proteins (those specific for maltose, ribose, or glucose/galactose), all of which undergo a significant decrease in R g of ϳ0.1 nm upon binding ligand (24).…”
Section: Fhud2 Function In S Aureusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A muted conformational change was predicted from the high resolution structures of liganded FhuD and crystal structure data from the related proteins BtuF (E. coli) and TroA (T. pallidum) both crystallized in their liganded and unliganded forms. However, crystallization itself may select for a particular conformation, as it did in the case of unliganded ribose-binding protein, in which the "closed" conformation was present in the crystal despite the fact that, in solution, the predominant conformation of the unliganded protein is "open" (24,27). Our SAXS analysis provides the first demonstration that, in solution, the conformation of FhuD2 does not change when it binds its ligand.…”
Section: Fhud2 Function In S Aureusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This decrease in R g of 0.04 nm is a relatively minor change, and is discernable only because of the very high quality of the SAXS data; nevertheless, it indicates that the protein undergoes a contraction upon binding ferrichrome. For comparison, maltose-binding protein (MBP) undergoes a large conformational change that has been well characterized by x-ray crystallography (28,29), and the R g of MBP shows a decrease of ϳ0.1 nm when it binds maltose in solution (30).…”
Section: Fhud1 In S Aureusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proteins by x-ray scattering in solution (22). Until 1998, all of the known PBP structures could be classified into two groups depending on the topology of the connection between the two lobes (23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%