1995
DOI: 10.1039/p29950001661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformational enantiomerism of bilirubin and pamoic acid induced by protonated aminocyclodextrins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“… UCB binding to β-cyclodextrin at various pH values . Experimental data (black squares) from Kano et al ., 1995 [ 14 ]. Curve A, calculated ellipticity assuming pKa values for UCB of 8.12 and 8.44, with B = dimers [ 4 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… UCB binding to β-cyclodextrin at various pH values . Experimental data (black squares) from Kano et al ., 1995 [ 14 ]. Curve A, calculated ellipticity assuming pKa values for UCB of 8.12 and 8.44, with B = dimers [ 4 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These 12 papers and one abstract are summarized in Additional files 1 , 2 and 3 (Tables S1, S2 & S3), which specify experimental deficiencies for each study. Finally, we confined our detailed analyses to the four best studies; binding of UCB to phosphatidylcholine (PC) [ 12 ], dodecylmaltoside micelles [ 13 ], β-cyclodextrins [ 14 ], and sodium taurocholate [ 15 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critique will focus especially on the purity of the UCB used, the presence of supersaturation with UCB in the systems studied, and extrapolation from results in non-aqueous solvents [53,54]. The review will also include a critical discussion of the extremely important role of pKa values of UCB in determining its pH-dependent interactions with phospholipid vesicles [1,55], bile salts [56,57] and cyclodextrins[58]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methylation at the sugar carboxyl groups interferes with their capacity to either hydrogen-bond or protonate the ester carbonyl oxygen. The observation that GMe is always more effective than GK2 throughout the pH range below 5.5 suggests that the hydrophobicity of the catalyst itself is a primarily significant factor for ester activation because the major hydrolysis process would occur in a hydrophobic environment, which would strengthen hydrogen bonding interactions that make significant contributions to transition state stabilization (11); the mixed micellization of POES with GMe is capable of providing a more hydrophobic micellar environment than that with GK2, judging from their surface tension and CMC values. Figure 4A shows the most plausible structure of the association complex formed in acidic solution, where the sugar carboxyl participates in hydrogen-bonding to the ester carbonyl oxygen (3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%