1988
DOI: 10.1021/bi00420a014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformational features of bovine heart mitochondrial transhydrogenase

Abstract: Both purified and functionally reconstituted bovine heart mitochondrial transhydrogenase were treated with various sulfhydryl modification reagents in the presence of substrates. In all cases, NAD+ and NADH had no effect on the rate of inactivation. NADP+ protected transhydrogenase from inactivation by 5,5'-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) in both systems, while NADPH slightly protected the reconstituted enzyme but stimulated inactivation in the purified enzyme. The rate of N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) inactiva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As pointed out above, treatment of the bovine mitochondrial nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase with NADPH increases the sensitivity of the enzyme to inhibition by a number of reagents, especially NEM and trypsin (Blazyk et al, 1976; Earle et al, 1978). These findings have been interpreted to mean that NADPH binding brings about a conformational change of the enzyme, which results in greater accessibility of the target moieties or bonds to modification by the added reagents (Blazyk et al, 1976;Earle et al, 1978;Modrak et al, 1988). The studies reported in this paper have shown that in the presence of NADPH a single sulfhydryl group belonging to cysteine-893 becomes highly susceptible to modification by NEM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…As pointed out above, treatment of the bovine mitochondrial nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase with NADPH increases the sensitivity of the enzyme to inhibition by a number of reagents, especially NEM and trypsin (Blazyk et al, 1976; Earle et al, 1978). These findings have been interpreted to mean that NADPH binding brings about a conformational change of the enzyme, which results in greater accessibility of the target moieties or bonds to modification by the added reagents (Blazyk et al, 1976;Earle et al, 1978;Modrak et al, 1988). The studies reported in this paper have shown that in the presence of NADPH a single sulfhydryl group belonging to cysteine-893 becomes highly susceptible to modification by NEM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The stimulatory effect of NADPH is not confined to trypsin sensitivity of the enzyme. It has also been reported in connection with inhibition of the transhydrogenase by thiol modifiers (Earle et al, 1978;Modrak et al, 1988;Yamaguchi & Hatefi, 1989), dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (Phelps & Hatefi, 1984), and ethoxyformic anhydride and dansyl chloride (Yamaguchi & Hatefi, 1985). Our recent studies with /V-ethylmaleimide as the inhibitor have shown that NADPH accelerates and NADP retards the inhibition rate, and that the pKt of the target residue (Cys-893) changes from 9.1 in the absence of added substrates to 8.7 in the presence of NADPH and to 9.5 in the presence of NADP (Yamaguchi & Hatefi, 1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%