1996
DOI: 10.1016/0166-1280(95)04461-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformational preference of the silyl group. Ab initio and molecular mechanics studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy barriers are slightly higher in n -butane, however. The very similar conformational properties of n -butane and 1 are consistent with the similar enthalpy differences between axial and equatorial conformers of methyl- and silylcyclohexane. , …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The energy barriers are slightly higher in n -butane, however. The very similar conformational properties of n -butane and 1 are consistent with the similar enthalpy differences between axial and equatorial conformers of methyl- and silylcyclohexane. , …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The very similar conformational properties of n-butane and 1 are consistent with the similar enthalpy differences between axial and equatorial conformers of methyl-and silylcyclohexane. 26,27 In 2, the enthalpy difference ∆H°between anti and gauche form is very small (0.14 (18) kcal mol -1 ) but still positive. This value is reproduced correctly by all four QC methods, which also predict slightly positive values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…26 Cho et al have compared calculated A values for the methyl and silyl groups. 27 They report A values of 2.14 kcal mol -1 (CH 3 ) and 1.90 kcal mol -1 (SiH 3 ) from ab initio calculations, whereas MM3 calculations resulted in 1.78 kcal mol -1 (CH 3 ) and 1.16 kcal mol -1 (SiH 3 ). The authors explained the lower A value of the silyl group compared with that of the methyl group by the longer SisC bond (1.904 Å) compared to the CsC bond (1.534 Å), which makes the axial SiH 3 sterically less unfavorable than the axial methyl group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A different effect is observed when X ) CH 3 , because the barrier becomes lower than in the corresponding carbon derivative: 2,3 this behavior has been interpreted 2,3 as being due to a consistent decrease in steric effects in the rotational maximum of type B in the molecule containing silicon owing to the CsSi being longer than the CsC bond distance. Reduced steric effects in silicon compounds with respect to the analogous carbon derivatives have been reported 14 for the conformational behavior of cyclohexyl derivatives as well. The X group in the CH 2 SiX 3 rotor affects the hyperconjugative character of the CsSi bond 3 , becoming smaller when X ) Cl with respect to X ) H and CH 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%