1987
DOI: 10.1016/0032-3950(87)90374-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformations of comb-like macromolecules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

33
375
7

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(415 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
33
375
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The same exponent follows from the log-log plot presented as an inset in the same figure. This value of the exponent is still smaller than the 0.72 derived by Birshtein and co-workers 19 and the 0.75 given by Fredrickson,22 however, it is at the same time much larger than the 3D SAW value of 0.588. So, although we are obviously far away from the real scaling regime, it is quite obvious that the excluded volume effect is operational for our structures.…”
Section: A Persistence Length and Bottle-brush Diametercontrasting
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The same exponent follows from the log-log plot presented as an inset in the same figure. This value of the exponent is still smaller than the 0.72 derived by Birshtein and co-workers 19 and the 0.75 given by Fredrickson,22 however, it is at the same time much larger than the 3D SAW value of 0.588. So, although we are obviously far away from the real scaling regime, it is quite obvious that the excluded volume effect is operational for our structures.…”
Section: A Persistence Length and Bottle-brush Diametercontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…19,29 Therefore, we conclude that the above analysis indeed addresses the intermediate coverage limit. As far as the possibility of lyotropic behavior is concerned, the authors 19 speculate that the persistence length of the bottle-brush structure will be of the same order of magnitude as its diameter and hence, that lyotropic behavior due to excluded volume effects alone should not be expected. Here, their opinion obviously differs with that of Fredrickson, who on the basis of an analysis of a fully stretched structure came to the exact opposite conclusion.…”
Section: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a good solvent, the bottlebrush radius is predicted [79][80][81][82][83] it is important to note that side-chain conformations within the 2D plane are highly anisotropic. 82 In a theta solvent, the bottlebrush radius is predicted to scale with N 2/3 or N 3/4 , depending on the model assumptions, 80,84 while the radius of free linear chains scales with N 1/2 (ideal chain). The bottlebrush is even stretched in a poor solvent: the bottlebrush radius is predicted to scale as 84 while the radius of free linear chains scales as N 1/3 .…”
Section: Synthesis Of Bottlebrush Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%