Establishment of hospital accreditation programs is increasingly growing across numerous developing nations. Such initiatives aim to improve quality of care. However, such establishments, mainly incentivized by successful and famous accreditation plans in developed countries, usually suffer from lack of necessary arrangements which, in turn, result in undesired consequences. Indeed, the first priority for such nations, including Iran, is not establishment of accreditation programs, yet strict licensing plans.
Similarities Between Accreditation and Olympic GamesHospital accreditation programs, with a history of more than six decades in developed nations, 1 may have some similarities with the Olympic Games. Both aimed to improve the quality and outcomes, one in care and services and the other in physical abilities and records. Both work through establishment of some type of competition, the former among hospitals and the latter among athletes and nations. Indeed, the participants may first pass some basic requirements, the basic level of standards or the qualification records to be qualified for the competition. In both events, the participants are usually among the fittest ones, well-organized hospitals and the nationally selected athletes, respectively. Therefore, the expected quality of participants in the events is much higher than what is expected from the average of typical hospitals or athletes. In both, the winners are rewarded, by a gold seal, or gold medal, which brings them other achievements such as reputation and possibly financial benefits. Both events need funding, which usually come from application fees paid by applicant hospitals or the membership fees, paid by member nations. Finally, both events take place every three-four years. Such similarities are seen between most accreditation programs of developed nations and the Olympic Games. However, the story is rather different in some developing countries.
2-5Different Story in Iran and Some Developing Countries Developing countries historically suffer from a lack of effective control over hospital establishment considerations 6,7 and Iran is no exception. Such considerations may include need assessment, site selection, mapping, construction and material, wards and spaces, staffing, and equipping. Finally after the establishment, hospitals should be monitored for their clinical processes and outcomes. to prepare themselves for the accreditation. Therefore, there would be no minimum entrance requirement for accreditation. Such obligation from the government side for national accreditation was probably in order to make sure that hospitals would not miss basic requirements, as there was no other effective means that check and control the basics across hospitals. Such basic requirements could be related to space and building such as a separate entrance for emergency department (ED), minimum of 9 m 2 space per bed in any inpatient room, etc 12 or human resources that hospitals have no or less control over them.13 Against this kind of standards...